Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 2"

Latest revision as of 10:32, March 3, 2018

Passed[edit]

Coach Krupt[edit]

Full of all its information. TheUnderfaker 22:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Support (1)[edit]

1. It looks good to me. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 22:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

With no opposes after months, I'll pass it. TheUnderfaker 18:18, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Woodrow[edit]

After giving the article a makeover, I'm submitting it as a comprehensive nomination for a couple of reasons: 1) We need nominations, and 2) Since this upcoming summer will probably have plenty of speculation about "Nedna", it would be kinda cool for an article about Edna's love life to get some front-page space. -- Mythigator 12:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Support (2)[edit]

1. Yes, is a good article. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 13:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
2. TheUnderfaker 16:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Town Jubilation Committee[edit]

We do need more comprehensive (and featured) articles. I think this article covers all the bases. TheUnderfaker 17:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Support (2)[edit]

1. Not the greatest article we have but it is complete. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 17:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
2. Looks pretty good now, if I may say so myself. -- Mythigator 06:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (0)[edit]

1. The article has all the essential facts but could use a little spiffing up. I'll have a go at it later today. -- Mythigator 14:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC) Sorted. -- Mythigator 06:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Stephen Hawking (character)[edit]

Very complete article, everythings there. A first I think. Doh5678 (talk) 19:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Support (2)[edit]

1. Good article with all the essential facts; looks GREAT after a bit of sorting out and just a little expansion. -- Mythigator 13:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
2. A lot better now. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (0)[edit]

1. I feel that the history could be expanded a bit first. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 19:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Allergies[edit]

A great page that I have put a lot of effort into bringing up and getting all the sources for. I think it deserves recognition for all my hard work on it :) ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 17:27, 10 October 2011 (EDT)

Support (5)[edit]

1. It's a well written article, everything from the show appears to be there. Info from the comics/other media may be lacking, but I couldnt say for sure. I do know there was a comic where Jimbo was allergic to bees, can't recall the name though. I'll see if I can dig it up later. Otherwise great article! --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 21:55, 10 October 2011 (EDT)
2. Great article, and one that I didn't even know existed. Nicely done! -- Mythigator 13:11, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
3. Your hard work's payed off! --Will k (Talk ~ Contributions) 07:13, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
4. Great article, great pictures. TheUnderfaker 12:20, 19 October 2011 (EDT)
5. Per all of the above. Doh5678 ^talk 12:23, 19 October 2011 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

• Jimbo's allergy to bee stings was revealed in the comic story "How the Vest Was Won!". -- Mythigator 02:58, 11 October 2011 (EDT)

Robopet[edit]

Put a lot of work into getting this to be complete and I now feel that it is. Descent enough article and pretty lengthy for a one time thing. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 10:55, 11 November 2011 (EST)

Support (4)[edit]

1. Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans! 17:18, 11 November 2011 (EST)
2. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 17:53, 11 November 2011 (EST)
3. --Will k (Talk ~ Contributions) 03:13, 12 November 2011 (EST)
4. Only voting for this one since Phinbart is, I LOVE YOU MATTHEW!!! <3 101.103.137.168 05:13, 26 November 2011 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Mister Honeybunny[edit]

Put a lot of work in to it, now it's a complete article! (with a snazzy image and all) --Will k (Talk ~ Contributions) 03:13, 12 November 2011 (EST)

Support (3)[edit]

1. ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 03:26, 12 November 2011 (EST)
2. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 12:36, 12 November 2011 (EST)
3. Cool picture, and bringing in the facts from the different sources is a nice touch. -- Mythigator 02:41, 23 November 2011 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Unidentified Flying Outrage![edit]

Amazing article for a book only in one episode. Full to the brim with info. Doh5678 (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2011 (EDT)

Support (3)[edit]

1. Excellent complete article. ☆The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)}☆ 17:28, 10 October 2011 (EDT)
2. Amazing! --Wk (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2012 (EST)
3. Definitly one that should be featured. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 18:39, 24 February 2012 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

• By the time you bring in all of the pertinent information about the book, you've pretty much got the episode's entire subplot. Small wonder it turned out to be huge for a book article. -- Mythigator 12:24, 9 September 2011 (EDT)

Zombies[edit]

A great article with everything looking good. Seems to be complete with all info in it.

Support (2)[edit]

1. Cook879 16:17, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
2. Very detailed and lots of images. Josegiraffio 18:51, 31 March 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Rake[edit]

Very unorthodox article but I think it is near enough complete, if not complete. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 18:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Definately complete. No major worries. Doh5678 (talk) 16:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Evil Krusty Doll[edit]

All info there. Great looking article. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 14:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Lots of details and well written. WebkinzMania 08:36, 21 April 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (1)[edit]

1. Just a little sorting out is needed. There was already an article called "Killer Krusty Doll". The "Evil" article is far superior, though, so I will merge the content from "Killer" into "Evil" and then set up a redirect. -- Mythigator 21:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

• I swore there was one but couldn't find it... The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 21:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Revenge of the Space Mutants[edit]

As long as it can be, and full with info from a 1 minute short. Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans! 12:36, 4 October 2011 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Seems good enough to me. Solar Dragon ^{(Talk • Contribs.)} 17:27, 10 October 2011 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

The Troll Twins of Underbridge Academy[edit]

A good looking article, full of all the information and has got the basic plot in quotes too. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 14:37, 22 November 2011 (EST)

Support (2)[edit]

1. Good article. Fast work putting it together! -- Mythigator 02:51, 23 November 2011 (EST)
2. Per above. WebkinzMania 08:37, 21 April 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (1)[edit]

1. Meh. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 08:52, 21 April 2012 (EDT)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Nick McKaig[edit]

Definitely complete and long for a one time crew member. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 12:52, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

Support (3)[edit]

1. Cook879 14:50, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
2. Awesome. Well done! --Fred (Talk • Contribs.) 05:17, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
3. Looks good!--Gatorman02 21:52, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (1)[edit]

1. I dunno, not really supportive. | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 13:01, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

#Though complete, there are articles on this list I think are more deserving.--Cook879 14:45, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

• The only reason I voted for the article is because we always have the same type of comprehensive article. So, it would be good to have something different. --Fred (Talk • Contribs.) 04:47, 1 April 2012 (EDT)

Monkey Garden[edit]

I think this article could be comprehensive. Full with all information from the short. Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans! 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

I suppose it's complete, but I had to put half of it into past tense. PHINBART!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 12:25, 26 March 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Viktor[edit]

I added info about roughly all the time he appeared, it has some trivia, I think it could be comprehensive. | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 03:13, 20 March 2012 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Looks fine to me. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 09:10, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
2. Because he's Ukrainian. The article looks pretty much up to shape. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 18:11, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

#Without voice actor information, it can not be comprehensive. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 03:24, 20 March 2012 (EDT)

Comments[edit]

• I went for Ping Marshall, as he's one time and we don't have him for any other character. | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 03:46, 20 March 2012 (EDT)
• Isn't he supposed to be a reference or parody to some character from the show 24? I beleive the character was also named Victor, and had his wife killed and then was killed by Keifer Sutherland's character in that show. Or something like that. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 18:17, 23 May 2012 (EDT)
• He is - I put it on the references, must have forgot about the article.--Cook879 11:25, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Homer's Hunting Club[edit]

A great article with multiple images and definitely deserves to be comprehensive. Contains an abundance of information. Josegiraffio 18:22, 31 March 2012 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Great article. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 09:10, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments (0)[edit]

New York Yankees[edit]

For a page that was started over one hour ago, it has 3,418 bytes and a lot of references and is very informative. I listed former Yankee players that were on the Simpsons (or mentioned). WebkinzMania 08:40, 21 April 2012 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Great looking article. Well done on putting it together. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 09:10, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Shauna[edit]

Definitely complete article, well written. All info there. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 13:58, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. We are very lucky we had an episode focused on her. The article improved so much. WebkinzMania 14:39, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Flaming Homer[edit]

Great looking article, very long and complete. Solar Dragon ^{(Talk • Contribs.)} 10:59, 15 May 2012 (EDT)

Support (2)[edit]

1. No voting is boring. | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 03:27, 15 June 2012 (EDT)
2. Nominate some more articles then. :P --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 09:40, 15 June 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

The Springfield Squares[edit]

Not all that long an article, but I believe it does have all the available information. -- Mythigator 09:54, 15 June 2012 (EDT)

Support (2)[edit]

1. Had to make a few changes to it after uploading a better image but it should be fine now. The Solar Dragon 07:21, 10 July 2012 (EDT)
2. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 09:45, 17 July 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (1)[edit]

1. Since I made the nomination, I'm staying out of the voting, but it does look a lot better now with the image and formatting changes. -- Mythigator 09:27, 17 July 2012 (EDT)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Springfield Monorail[edit]

Decent sized; has a number of paragraphs and sections. WebkinzMania 19:36, 16 June 2012 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Uploaded a better quality image and a couple more images for the article so it should now be fine. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 07:31, 10 July 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Shadow Knight[edit]

Good looking article with all information there. The Solar Dragon 07:14, 10 July 2012 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Needed some MoS going-over and a little bit of fleshing out; looks VERY good now (it was pretty good already). Excellent example of a short but comprehensive article. -- Mythigator 09:23, 17 July 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Trans-Clown-O-Morphs[edit]

Lengthy, good-looking article. Complete and even has the theme song on the page. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 06:49, 11 August 2012 (EDT)

Support (3)[edit]

1. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 07:11, 26 August 2012 (EDT)
2. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 11:23, 26 August 2012 (EDT)
3. Excellent example of how an article doesn't need to be long to be comprehensive. -- Mythigator 12:54, 26 August 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Mapple[edit]

Good article, not quite featured content. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 13:41, 8 August 2012 (EDT)

Support (3)[edit]

1. Looks good. -- Mythigator 22:50, 13 October 2012 (EDT)
2. --Cook879 15:33, 30 November 2012 (EST)
3. User:WebkinzMania/sig 18:45, 22 January 2013 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Dome[edit]

Good looking article, lengthy, complete. ☆The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)}☆ 15:35, 28 August 2012 (EDT)

Support (4)[edit]

1. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 11:15, 2 September 2012 (EDT)
2. --Cook879 15:33, 30 November 2012 (EST)
3. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 17:37, 30 November 2012 (EST)
4. --Mythigator 08:41, 1 January 2013 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Panda-Monium![edit]

I'm not sure if it's quite up to the level of featured content, but since this article has all of its information I'm pretty sure it qualifies as comprehensive. -- Mythigator 09:02, 19 November 2012 (EST)

Support (2)[edit]

1. --Cook879 15:33, 30 November 2012 (EST)
2. A good lengthy article. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 16:10, 30 November 2012 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Baby translator[edit]

A great article about the translator which is full to the brim with information about the topic. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 15:54, 22 January 2013 (EST)

Support (2)[edit]

1. User:WebkinzMania/sig 18:45, 22 January 2013 (EST)
2. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 23:31, 20 February 2013 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Rock Bottom[edit]

Too minor an article to be feature-worthy, but it is complete with all its information. -- Mythigator 08:41, 1 January 2013 (EST)

Support (2)[edit]

1. A good, concise article with all relevant info. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 01:04, 21 February 2013 (EST)
2. Great article, full to the brim with info. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 04:47, 3 April 2013 (EDT)

Neutral (1)[edit]

1. I believe there is better articles that deserve it more. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 05:38, 23 January 2013 (EST)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

• Nice to see a little debate about this submission. It's entirely fitting; after all, Rock Bottom is all about controversy! -- Mythigator 15:23, 16 March 2013 (EDT)

Superstar Celebrity Microphone[edit]

Also not a candidate for featured status. But it has all its information, so it's worth tossing into the mix as a nominee. -- Mythigator 09:34, 3 April 2013 (EDT)

Support (2)[edit]

1. Good article. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 04:24, 8 April 2013 (EDT)
2. Nice article! --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 19:28, 24 May 2013 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Aphrodite Inn[edit]

I set out to just clear up some citation issues, but now that the dust has all settled, I think the article qualifies as comprehensive. -- Mythigator 08:03, 23 June 2013 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

1. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 00:03, 24 June 2013 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

General Sherman[edit]

Has all of its information and looks pretty good. -- Mythigator 09:54, 3 July 2013 (EDT)

Support (2)[edit]

1. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 13:04, 2 August 2013 (EDT)
2. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 21:34, 23 August 2013 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Mr. and Mrs. Erotic American[edit]

Could use a better-quality picture, but as far as the information is concerned, it's in fine shape. -- Mythigator (talk) 00:53, March 13, 2014 (EDT)

Support (3)[edit]

1. Looks good. The Solar Dragon 13:39, May 1, 2014 (EDT)
2. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 16:18, May 1, 2014 (EDT)
3. It is good enough to fit as a Comprehensive article. / Loco87 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 13:31, May 2, 2014 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

• I've uploaded a better quality version of the picture. / Loco87 ^{(TALK / Contribs)} 09:42, June 12, 2014 (EDT)

LGBT characters[edit]

Long article, but its list/bullet point structure makes it not a good featured article candidate. Comprehensive is the best it could get. The Solar Dragon 13:37, May 1, 2014 (EDT)

Support (4)[edit]

1. Support. I think Solar's summary is a spot-on assessment of the article. -- Mythigator (talk) 10:24, May 3, 2014 (EDT)
2. Looks good. Only option we have here at the moment anyway. XD | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 11:39, August 26, 2014 (EDT)
3. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 12:07, August 26, 2014 (EDT)
4. Nice Article. / Loco87 ^{(TALK / Contribs)} 12:55, August 27, 2014 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Funzo[edit]

As Phinbart said, it may fit better as Comprehensive article. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 13:17, November 16, 2014 (EST)

Support (3)[edit]

1. Great comprehensive article nom now it's been lengthened. Fits in with Christmas. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 15:07, November 17, 2014 (EST)
2. Everything's looking pretty good. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 17:26, November 17, 2014 (EST)
3. --Fred (Talk • Contribs.) 02:39, November 26, 2014 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Failed[edit]

Taken down[edit]

Itchy & Scratchy animation cel[edit]

Full to the brim with info. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 16:34, 7 April 2012 (EDT)

Support (5)[edit]

1. Well, I had to change "and" to an ampersand (&), because that is how the show's title is written like. It is an okay article. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 23:13, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
2. Three people had to do major stuff to this article; I had to put the history in past tense. Anyway, it's seems okay now so I think it could become comprehensive. | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 12:36, 23 May 2012 (EDT)
3. Support the nomination now. The article looks a lot better after all the work that everyone put into it. -- Mythigator 09:42, 31 May 2012 (EDT)
4. Definitly deserves it now. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 10:16, 31 May 2012 (EDT)
5. Make it six supports. WebkinzMania 14:51, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

#Made the changes from cell to cel and now it's looking good. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 09:10, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

#Good article, but the term is cel (only ONE "L") when it's used in reference to animated cartoons. -- Mythigator 15:17, 12 April 2012 (EDT) (Withdrawn after Solar fixed the spelling. -- Mythigator 09:42, 31 May 2012 (EDT))

Oppose (1)[edit]

1. I've changed my mind with this. It shouldn't be a comprehensive article, it should be nominated for featured. ☆The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)}☆ 15:30, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

Comments[edit]

• How about it's nominated for featured comprehensive? | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 15:31, 31 May 2012 (EDT)
  • No, just featured... Solar Dragon ^{(Talk • Contribs.)} 15:53, 31 May 2012 (EDT)
• Taken down due to the fact I've nominated it for featured instead. ☆The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)}☆ 04:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Screamapillar[edit]

I believe it contains adequate enough information to be a comprehensive article, and seems to include as much information as possible. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 14:49, April 13, 2014 (EDT)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (1)[edit]

1. I'm nominating it for featured instead. The Solar Dragon 13:38, May 1, 2014 (EDT)

Comments[edit]

- It has been voted as Featured Article / Loco87 ^{(TALK / Contribs)} 08:43, July 1, 2014 (EDT)