• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: Another Preview Image for “The Man Who Flew Too Much” and details on other episodes have been released!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: Two new Preview Images for “The Man Who Flew Too Much” have been released!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 4

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki

Passed[edit]

Mount Rushmore[edit]

It fits as a Comprehensive article. / Loco87 (SimpsonsFT.pngSimpsonsFA.pngSimpsonsFL.pngSimpsonsFK.png / Contribs) 10:58, November 1, 2016 (EDT)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • A Comprehensive article for November was needed! / Loco87 (SimpsonsFT.pngSimpsonsFA.pngSimpsonsFL.pngSimpsonsFK.png / Contribs) 10:58, November 1, 2016 (EDT)

Polar Express[edit]

Decently-enough Christmas-themed article that may fit as December's Comprehensive article. / Loco87 (SimpsonsFT.pngSimpsonsFA.pngSimpsonsFL.pngSimpsonsFK.png / Contribs) 11:44, November 8, 2016 (EST)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • A Comprehensive article for December was needed! / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 08:14, December 1, 2016 (EST)

Steamboat Itchy[edit]

Short and sweet and all complete. In spite of its small size, the article has a variety of information and IMO it's a perfect example of a comprehensive article. -- Mythigator (talk) 13:39, December 28, 2016 (EST)

Support (1)[edit]

  1. Good article. Fits perfectly as comprehensive. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 08:38, December 29, 2016 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

The Gabbo Show[edit]

I think it can fit as comprehensive article. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 08:53, January 31, 2017 (EST)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • A comprehensive article for February was needed! / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 08:13, February 1, 2017 (EST)

Ribwich[edit]

Fits as comprehensive article and we need one for March! / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 06:42, March 1, 2017 (EST)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • A comprehensive article for March was needed! / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 06:42, March 1, 2017 (EST)

Buzz Cola[edit]

Complete article that might be too short for featured article. I see it more as a comprehensive article than as a featured article. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 07:02, March 1, 2017 (EST)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • A Comprehensive article for May was needed! / Loco87 (Talk / Contribs) 11:25, May 1, 2017 (EDT)

Arnie Pye[edit]

It may fit as comprehensive. / Loco87 (Talk / Contribs) 11:37, May 1, 2017 (EDT)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • A Comprehensive article for June was needed! / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 11:14, June 1, 2017 (EDT)

Guy Incognito[edit]

Seems like a decent and complete article. The Solar Dragon 16:14, July 13, 2017 (EDT)

Support (2)[edit]

  1. Seems decent and complete to me. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 09:00, July 14, 2017 (EDT)
  2. It looks good. I know that more than one person has been working on it, so it also represents a true collaborative effort. -- Mythigator (talk) 22:02, July 27, 2017 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • Were you nominating the article for Guy Incognito the Guy Incognito or the crew member? The link goes to the crew member. -- Mythigator (talk) 21:56, July 13, 2017 (EDT)

Parker Peterman[edit]

Pretty pleased with how this article turned out. The Solar Dragon 18:05, July 27, 2017 (EDT)

Support (2)[edit]

  1. Looks pretty good. I'd be chuffed about it too, if I were you! -- Mythigator (talk) 22:05, July 27, 2017 (EDT)
  2. Looks good. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 07:13, August 30, 2017 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Moog[edit]

It may fit as comprehensive article for October. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 10:20, September 30, 2015 (EDT)

Support (2)[edit]

  1. Save it for October, but I think it's fine. The Solar Dragon 13:44, June 28, 2017 (EDT)
  2. Looks good. Concur with saving it for October. -- Mythigator (talk) 23:46, July 6, 2017 (EDT)

Neutral (1)[edit]

  1. It needs a Behind the Laughter section, but other than that it looks ok. --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 16:56, September 30, 2015 (EDT)

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • Added a BtL section. -- Mythigator (talk) 00:44, October 7, 2015 (EDT)

Hugh Jass[edit]

Meets the criteria for comprehensive, and it's a fun read due to the tie-in to Bart's prank phone calls. -- Mythigator (talk) 20:11, August 6, 2017 (EDT)

Support (1)[edit]

  1. Seems fine. / Loco87 (SimpsonsFT.pngSimpsonsFA.pngSimpsonsFL.pngSimpsonsFK.png / Contribs) 11:56, October 31, 2017 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

Rejected[edit]

Title screen gag[edit]

Fixed the article up a bit, looks good for compr. | SimpsonsFR.pngSimpsonsFA.pngSimpsonsFN.pngSimpsonsFD.pngSimpsonsFO.pngSimpsonsFM.pngSimpsonsFN.pngSimpsonsFO.png | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 17:07, September 14, 2014 (EDT)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (1)[edit]

  1. I actually believe there could be more to be said about it. It doesn't seem complete enough to me... The Solar Dragon 13:38, February 28, 2015 (EST)

Comments[edit]

Funtendo Zii[edit]

It may fit as comprehensive article. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 15:10, February 27, 2015 (EST)

Support (1)[edit]

1. Sounds like a awesome idea! I love Nintendo. 180.200.149.174 21:51, January 14, 2016 (EST)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (1)[edit]

  1. 5 appearances and only 2 things referenced in the history - seems incomplete to me. The Solar Dragon 13:38, February 28, 2015 (EST)

Comments[edit]

Withdrawn[edit]