Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 1"

Revision as of 18:35, January 30, 2011

Passed

Mr. Plow (business)

It is a decent length article for something as minor as this. It will never make featured status but I feel it is long enough to deserve some credit. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 10:53, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support (3)

1. Suprisinly well developed. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 11:11, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
2. Good article. It has my vote. — ^TheHomer ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 19:43, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
3. Complete. --Smiley12 was here at 04:12, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Homer Simpson (Police Cops)

I made this article and was pleased of how lengthy it was for such a minor character. It has two pictures and is properly referenced for something like that. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 10:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support (3)

1. Yup. Good article.    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   22:14, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
2. That's what's up. TheUnderfaker 15:24, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
3. Got my Support. --Smiley12 was here at 04:12, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Shapes

A great article with history and a table of Known Customers. Brassbandplayer 09:58, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Support (5)

1. Along with the above, two well-written articles the caliber of which I this Wiki should be producing. Keep it up! TheUnderfaker 15:08, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
2. Yup    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   15:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
3. If we could get a quote about it, that would be good. Otherwise, it is fine. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:37, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
4. Good article. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 15:51, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
5. Very good, Support --Smiley12 was here at 03:57, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Added a quote. -- Mythigator 01:23, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Fort Fragg

A detailed and well-written article (that I take no credit for). TheUnderfaker 19:43, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Support (4)

1. Good article.    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   15:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
2. If we could get a quote about it, that would be good. Otherwise, it is fine. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:37, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
3. Support --Smiley12 was here at 03:57, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
4. Informative despite size, proven to be useful and therfore feature worthy to me Cronokinetic 21:41, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (1)

1. Unfortunately, there really isn't a good quote about Fort Fragg (unless you want a snip from the quasi-flirtatious dialogue of the soldiers in the shower room). There isn't all that much information about the fort in general, but the article does have what there is. -- Mythigator 12:50, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Flanders the Devil

A massive article for a character who appeared in one episode. I would say that it is just off featured status. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 18:28, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support (2)

1. Yup. Good article,    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   21:24, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
2. A good article for a one time character. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 15:46, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Are articles on non-canon topics suitable for comprehensive article nominations? Just wondering, because the criteria do say the article must include all canon information, which won't be the case for Treehouse of Horror characters. Maybe the criteria need to be tweaked slightly. That said, though, I think the Devil Flanders is a good article (if it's not too biased of me to say so). On a slightly different topic and looking forward a bit, it would be cool (IMO) to feature one or more Treehouse of Horror articles on the front page of the wiki when October arrives. -- Mythigator 20:15, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Changed the criteria slightly. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 21:21, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Steve Mobbs

A good, long, detailed article on a one time character. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 19:29, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support (2)

1. Yes. Great page!    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   21:24, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
2. Good article with multiple images. Brassbandplayer 15:53, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Milo

Huge article for someone who only appeared at the start of an episode. --Smiley12 was here at 22:03, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support (2)

1. Yeah. As Smiley said, great page for a one-time character.    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   22:15, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
2. Seems like a great article. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 12:24, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Milo's personality really comes across in how he sets up and runs his store. And since the episode spends a good amount of time in the store, it actually provides quite a lot of information about Milo. -- Mythigator 13:58, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Adil Hoxha

A well-done article of a minor character. - --ThePlatypus 14:29, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Support (3)

1. It's got my vote. -- Mythigator 03:57, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
2. Once again, I would like a quote as most articles can get a quote. Otherwise, it is fine. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 06:39, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
3. Yeah, good article.    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   12:52, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

#Needs some MoS tweaks, but otherwise looks good. -- Mythigator 15:03, August 30, 2010 (UTC) Withdrawn after giving the article a makeover. -- Mythigator 03:56, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Because Adil literally lives a double life while he's staying with the Simpsons, it seemed appropriate to use two quotes. -- Mythigator 12:24, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Lurleen Lumpkin

A really good article for a character who has only spoke in three episodes with a lot of detail. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 13:50, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Support (2)

1. Well, it could do with a quote but otherwise, it is a good article. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 20:16, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
2. Fixed it up and support now. TheUnderfaker 14:27, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Ultrahouse 3000

A massive article for such a minor character/building. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 07:13, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Support (3)

1. A really good article. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 07:34, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
2. Support. — ^TheHomer ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 14:07, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
3. Fine by me. Support. TheUnderfaker 14:32, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Opening Sequence

A massive article, not likely to get featured though, that is full of pictures and information about each of the opening sequences. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 14:14, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Support (4)

1. Agreed. Has had a lot of work put into it... Effluvium 20:17, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
2. Highly detailed. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 20:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
3. Also agreed. -- Mythigator 15:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Epic article. -- Lotito491 18:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Lord Montymort

Great article for a character that's only made one non-canon appearance. Unlikely to get featured. Doh5678 14:33 October 16th

Support (3)

1. Looks good. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 12:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
2. Good, long article that probably isn't long enough to get featured. Had a lot of effort put into writing it. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 13:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
3. Got my vote. -- Mythigator 10:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Failed

Mindy Simmons

Quite a big article with a large Behind the Laughter section for a character who only appeared in one episode plus a few cameos. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 11:30, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support (4)

1. A quote would be good, however, it is large for a character like her. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 12:25, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
2. Yup    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   12:28, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
3. It's got my vote. And now also a quote. -- Mythigator 13:53, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
4. Yup. - ThePlatypus 14:19, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (1)

1. The BtL section should be referenced and the Non-canon section isn't necessarily non-canon, it was just a dream/illusion, and should be stated as such. TheUnderfaker 14:20, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

I created a template for commentaries, so the BtL section can be referenced. TheUnderfaker 15:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

For a comprehensive article I think there should be a better image. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 17:33, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Decided to fail this as it still has some problems. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 07:16, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Ian Maxtone-Graham (Withdrawn)

One of the longest staff articles I've seen and has no red links at all. Doh5678 18:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Support (0)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (2)

1. A lot of content unrelated to the Simpsons and probably copied from Wikipedia. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 18:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Also opposed, for the same reasons. This article needs to be rewritten. -- Mythigator 05:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• Withdrawn because it's unrelated to the Simpsons. Doh5678 18:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
  • It's not that it is unrelated to The Simpsons, it is just that some of the content is unrelated and copied from Wikipedia. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 21:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Moved

All article nominations that have been moved to Wikisimpsons:Featured article due to being lengthy enough to become featured.

Springfield Nuclear Power Plant softball team

Probably as big as a team featured in a single episode can get. It took a lot of work, but I'm quite proud of the number of images in this one too. -- Brian McClure 20:48, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Support (6)

1. I guessed this would be coming as soon as I saw the article coming along. It is a great article. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 20:52, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
2. Great article. Gran2 21:18, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
3. Giant article for a softball team. — ^TheHomer ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 01:01, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
4. Agree. --Smiley12 was here at 06:09, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
5. Absolutely yes. Awesome article, Brian! -- Mythigator 18:18, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
6. Excellent ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 20:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

• Could this possibly be a featured article actually? It has great length and detail, even for a comprehensive article. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 05:21, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • I was thinking that. I would support it ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 20:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • I was also thinking the same thing. Its size is more befitting of featured instead of comprehensive status. And seeing all the support it's gotten here, we can just forego the featured article process and go ahead and promote it to that status. (We can possibly even make it next month's featured article.) TheUnderfaker 14:51, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
    • Should I just cut and paste this onto the featured article nominations then? ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:10, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
    • Yeah. TheUnderfaker 15:24, September 21, 2010 (UTC)