Wikisimpsons:Featured article/Past Nominations 1
All past featured article nominations.
Contents
Passed
Trappuccino
I would like to nominate Trappuccino for a featured article. It is a very detailed article on the events that happened in the film and it looks like a very good, well written article. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 10:29, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Support
- Wow, i never even we knew of this article until someone edited Spider-Pig with it, but even then i didn't know how detailed it was.--Sgtcook (My Talk Page) 12:42, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Good idea for featured article this month. >DohAyeCarumbaDoh
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Frank Grimes
Well-detailed article, and (since I have been here) not featured yet. Jessica98sites 04:49, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Support (4)
- I like it, would be good featured article. >DohAyeCarumbaDoh
- Since the article has been cleaned up, I have changed my mind. However, I think that Marge Simpson really should come first. It is a lot better than this article. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 17:33, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
- --Simpsons88 (messages · +) 19:47, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed Alexandersig 18:51, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose (0)
All articles should be written with an in-universe point of view. Frank Grimes is not. A good character article should have all features of Project Characters. Frank Grimes still has a way to go. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 06:15, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral (0)
Comments
- Remember, strength of argument beats number of votes. It doesn't fit in with the above policies on a featured article so therefroe it shall not pass and can not be featured. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 06:19, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
Marge Simpson
Good detailed article and hasn't been featured yet. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 21:15, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
Support (6)
- Looks good. Should be featured. 78.149.162.102 15:40, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Okily-Dokily, this probably should be featured. D'ohAyeCarumbaD'oh 10:42, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I think this article should be featured. Very detailed. Jessica98sites 15:28, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
- All the other articles of Simpsons family members have already been featured except for this one, and the Marge Simpson article looks quite good. Ldude893 08:22, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
- One of my favourite articles on the wiki. It's a yes from me! UFO Editor 15:52, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes from me. Can't believe it hasn't been featured yet! Josegiraffio 16:52, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose (0)
Neutral (0)
Meh. Ldude893 14:07, February 23, 2010 (UTC)Uh,..................................... >DohAyeCarumbaDoh
Comments
Sideshow Bob
It's a good, large and informative article, everything's clean and in-universe style, and the appearances and information are all up to date. Ldude893 01:35, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
Support (9)
- Looks great to me. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 06:36, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, would be a great article to feature. Dohayecarumbadoh 23:35, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- One of the best articles on the wiki. It's a yes from me! Effluvium talk contributions email 09:55, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Effluvium. One of the best articles on the wiki, and its SO long! Kittykatmeow10 00:08, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
- A good detailed article. Would be great to feature. Josegiraffio 15:27, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Wait, why didn't I support this before? I forget. You have my support for this. - ThePlatypus 15:52, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
- And my support too. — TheHomer (Talk • Contributions) 19:15, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Concur; this is an excellent article. And with the recent episode featuring Sideshow Bob, a timely one as well. Mythigator 23:14, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Good article. UFO Editor 18:15, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose (0)
Neutral (0)
Comments
Rejected
Santa's Little Helper
I wanna nominate Santa's Little Helper. It's detailed and informative with lots of pictures. SpongeBoy 01:05, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
Support (0)
Oppose (3)
- Although it is long, it is not in in-universe point of view. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 08:44, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, he ain't gonna make it to the featured article spot like that. Dohayecarumbadoh 23:31, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Needs quite a lot of work - its not ready to be featured right now. Effluvium talk contributions email
Neutral (0)
Comments
Hans Moleman
A pretty good article. - ThePlatypus 22:51, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
Support (0)
Oppose (2)
- Not in in-universe style. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 06:59, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Not to ready to be featured now. Various problems - mainly it not being in-universe. Effluvium talk contributions email 22:13, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral (0)
Comments
Bleeding Gums Murphy
Oh wow. I didn't know it was possible to make that big of an article of someone like Bleeding Gums. - ThePlatypus 22:51, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
Support (0)
Oppose (3)
- Not in in-universe style. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 07:00, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I like the article -- heck, I like the character -- but it needs an in-universe cleanup. Mythigator 23:08, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Once it's in-universe, I'll happily give it my support. But not in its current state. Effluvium 16:37, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral (0)
Comments
If it had more references and was made in-universe though it would be a great article article to feature. - ThePlatypus 14:12, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, but it's not so no atm. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 14:14, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
Withdrawn
Springfield's State (Withdrawn)
Springfield's State is a massive article. It is of great quality and is probably one of our best articles outlining most occurrences of when the state was mentioned in some way with the real world. It is one of this wiki's longest articles and deserves to be featured. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 20:48, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
Support (2)
- Oh man, I never thought of featuring that article. It would be a great article to feature. - ThePlatypus
- Wow. This would be an AWSOME featured article! There is so much information, and it is a great topic to be featured. Kittykatmeow10 00:06, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral (1)
- It's well written, but it should be made In-Universe --Smiley12 was here at 06:30, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose (0)
Comments
- Anyone up for the task of shifting into in-universe view? ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 16:24, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn the request until in In-Universe pov. ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk)☆ 20:13, May 24, 2010 (UTC)