Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Featured article"

Revision as of 01:04, February 10, 2011

Past Nominations: 1

Contents 1 Featured article nominations 2 February 2011 3 The Simpsons 3.1 Support (5) 3.2 Neutral (1) 3.3 Oppose (0) 3.4 Comments 4 Shelbyville 4.1 Support (5) 4.2 Neutral (0) 4.3 Oppose (1) 4.4 Comments 5 The Simpsons Movie 5.1 Support (4) 5.2 Neutral (0) 5.3 Oppose (0) 5.4 Comments 6 Fat Tony 6.1 Support (3) 6.2 Neutral (1) 6.3 Oppose (0) 6.4 Comments 7 Ya Hoo! 7.1 For (0) 7.2 Neutral (0) 7.3 Against (1) 7.4 Comments

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wikisimpsons has to offer.

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...

1. ...be well written and detailed
2. ...be unbiased, from a neutral point of view
3. ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
4. ...follow the Manual of Style
5. ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
6. ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
7. ...have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
8. ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
9. ...have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
10. ...follow the rules in Project Characters if it is a character article.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:

1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
4. The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:

1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
   1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".
5. A user can only nominate one article a month.
6. All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.

Also remember to add {{nominated}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Featured article nominations

February 2011

The Simpsons

A great, massive article. It is one of the best on the wiki and should be featured. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 08:37, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Support (5)

1. Totally <span style="font-family:Elephant">[[User:TheSimpsons|'''<span style="color:red">The</span><span style="color:blue">Simpsons</span>''']] ^{[[User talk:TheSimpsons|'''<span style="color:gold">Talk'''</span>]]}</span> 14:48, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
2. Yup. A really good article. Effluvium
3. Its "The Simpsons" page what could be a better representation of the Simpsons wiki than it's main page Lordsunflash]
4. --Jeff ^{(talk2me) • (UnSimpsons steward)} 00:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
5. One of he best here! Doh5678 ^{(Any Notices) • (My Edits) • (Wikipedia Page)}

Neutral (1)

1. I don't really know. It seems like a good article, but there just seems something wrong about it. --Will k 05:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Shelbyville

A great article! - ThePlatypus 17:18, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support (5)

1. A great, long article and not a character! ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 09:30, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
2. Yup    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   22:21, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
3. Good article. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 14:34, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
4. "What town was that"? "Shelbyville" said Principal Skinner All- "Cheering", Seriously, Shelbyville, should be featured, it is a funny, always mocked city in the Simpsons Mitchell.friedman 20:52, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
5. Good Article. Featurd Quality. Doh5678 ^{(Any Notices) • (My Edits) • (Wikipedia Page)}

Neutral (0)

Oppose (1)

1. BOO! --Jeff ^{(talk2me) • (UnSimpsons steward)} 00:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
2. I know this is may sound silly, but I oppose because of the infobox picture. I mean, half of it's on appearance, and the main image is blurry! --Will k 05:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments

The Simpsons Movie

This is a massive article and it is a surprise it hasn't been featured already. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 06:59, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support (4)

1. Was just about to nominate myself actually. Yeah, great article!    Effluvium    talk    contributions    email   21:20, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
2. Very good article Wikiboy96 17:56, August 30, 2010 (UTC)Wikiboy96
3. Great pictures, great info, great article. --Will k 05:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
4. Great Article. Doh5678 ^{(Any Notices) • (My Edits) • (Wikipedia Page)}

Neutral (0)

• ? Doh5678 ^{(Any Notices) • (My Edits) • (Wikipedia Page)}

Oppose (0)

Comments

Fat Tony

A big article for a character like Fat Tony. All appearances completed and never been featured before. Josegiraffio ^{Want to talk} 13:51, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Support (3)

1. I like it Effluvium 16:30, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
2. Addded a quote. Very good article Doh5678 22:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
3. Definitely. This should be a memorial to him, since he was killed off. Dohayecarumbadoh 03:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (1)

1. I'm sorry, but it hasn't got enough pictures. It has great info, though, but the key parts of a featured article is its pictures and its information. --Will k 05:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Oppose (0)

Comments

Ya Hoo!

Massive article for a little thing like Ya Hoo! Very detailed. Doh5678 21:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

For (0)

Neutral (0)

Against (1)

1. Although a great article, it is not long enough to be featured. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 05:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments