• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: Promotional Images for “Women in Shorts” have been released!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: A new episode title, “Bad Boys… for Life?”, has been announced!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations"

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
m
 
(314 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| align="center" style="border:1px solid turquoise; background:#E0FFFF;  padding:10px; width: 100%;color: black;"
+
{| align="center" style="border:1px solid #{{DarkBox}}; background:#{{LightBox}};  padding:10px; width: 100%;color: black;"
 
|
 
|
 
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 2px solid #FFFFFF; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 15px; vertical-align: top;"
 
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 2px solid #FFFFFF; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 15px; vertical-align: top;"
 
|
 
|
{|align="right" style="text-align: center; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 20px; padding: 5px;"
+
{{Archivebox2|1=yes|2=yes|3=yes|4=yes|5=yes|6=yes}}
|<center>[[File:Archive filingcabinent.png|50px]]</center>
 
|-
 
|
 
'''Archives:''' [[Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 2|2]] [[Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 1|1]]
 
 
 
|-
 
|__TOC__
 
|}
 
  
 
This page is to nominate minor articles as being complete, or '''comprehensive articles.'''
 
This page is to nominate minor articles as being complete, or '''comprehensive articles.'''
Line 37: Line 29:
 
#Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 
#Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 
#Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 
#Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
#If, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be officially known as a "comprehensive article".
+
#If at the start of a month the article is the one with most support votes (and least oppose votes) it will be officially known as a "Comprehensive Article".
  
 
<big>''How to vote:''</big>
 
<big>''How to vote:''</big>
Line 45: Line 37:
 
##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 
##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 
#As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 
#As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
#Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the <code><nowiki>{{comp}}</nowiki></code> template can be added to the top of its page.
+
#Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (and the article has more support votes than any other nominated article), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the '''<big>{{Icons|CA}}</big>''' template can be added to the top of its page.
 
#All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.
 
#All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.
  
'''''Note:''''' Remember to sign your posts (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>).
+
'''''Note:''''' Remember to sign your posts (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
  
 
== Nominations ==
 
== Nominations ==
=== [[Lionel Hutz]] ===
+
=== [[The Little Universe]] ===
Full of infomation. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] 16:43, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
+
A good, complete article for Halloween. <span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span> 08:05, September 21, 2021 (EDT)
  
 
==== Support (0) ====
 
==== Support (0) ====
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
==== Oppose (1) ====
 
#With a bit of an improvement, it could be featured. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 23:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
 
=== [[Rake]] ===
 
Very unorthodox article but I think it is near enough complete, if not complete. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 18:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Support (1) ====
 
#Definately complete. No major worries. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] ([[User talk:Doh5678|talk]]) 16:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
 
=== [[Zombies]] ===
 
A great article with everything looking good. Seems to be complete with all info in it.
 
 
==== Support (1) ====
 
#[[User:Cook879|Cook879]] 16:17, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
 
  
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
Line 86: Line 53:
  
 
==== Comments ====
 
==== Comments ====
 +
*I guess it already has been featured, since it has the Comp template. / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=696969><font size="4"><font face="Agency FB">Loco</font></font></font><font color=4169E1><font face="Agency FB"><font size="4">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=Tomato><font face="Courier New">'''TALK'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|'''<font color=3CB371><font face="Century Gothic"><font size="2">Contribs</font></font></font>''']])</sup> 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)
  
=== [[Evil Krusty Doll]] ===
+
=== [[Brotherhood of the Spectacles]] ===
All info there. Great looking article. <span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 14:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
+
Might fit as a comprehensive article. / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=696969><font size="4"><font face="Agency FB">Loco</font></font></font><font color=4169E1><font face="Agency FB"><font size="4">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=Tomato><font face="Courier New">'''TALK'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|'''<font color=3CB371><font face="Century Gothic"><font size="2">Contribs</font></font></font>''']])</sup> 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)
  
 
==== Support (0) ====
 
==== Support (0) ====
 
==== Neutral (1) ====
 
#Just a little sorting out is needed. There was already an article called "[[Killer Krusty Doll]]". The "Evil" article is far superior, though, so I will merge the content from "Killer" into "Evil" and then set up a redirect. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 21:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
*I swore there was one but couldn't find it... <span style="font-family:AR Darling">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:black">The</span> <span style="color:blue">Solar</span> <span style="color:red">Dragon</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:bgreen">Talk</span>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|Contribs.]])</sup></span> 21:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 
 
=== [[Dome]] ===
 
A good article, full of content for a one time thing. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span> <span style="color:red">Solar</span> <span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:gold">Talk</span>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|Contribs.]])</sup></span>☆ 14:34, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
 
 
==== Support (1) ====
 
# [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 12:20, 19 October 2011 (EDT)
 
  
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
Line 111: Line 65:
  
 
==== Comments ====
 
==== Comments ====
 
=== [[Unidentified Flying Outrage!]] ===
 
Amazing article for a book only in one episode. Full to the brim with info. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] ([[User talk:Doh5678|talk]]) 12:03, 9 September 2011 (EDT)
 
 
==== Support (1) ====
 
#Excellent complete article. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span> <span style="color:red">Solar</span> <span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:gold">Talk</span>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|Contribs.]])</sup></span>☆ 17:28, 10 October 2011 (EDT)
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
*By the time you bring in all of the pertinent information about the book, you've pretty much got the episode's entire subplot. Small wonder it turned out to be huge for a book article. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 12:24, 9 September 2011 (EDT)
 
=== [[Revenge of the Space Mutants]] ===
 
As long as it can be, and full with info from a 1 minute short. [[User:Phinbart|Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans!]] 12:36, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
 
====Support (1)====
 
#Seems good enough to me. <span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px gold; font-family:Elephant">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span> <span style="color:green">Dragon</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:black">Talk</span>]] <span style="color:white">'''•'''</span> [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Contribs.</span>]])</sup></span> 17:27, 10 October 2011 (EDT)
 
 
====Neutral (0)====
 
====Oppose (0)====
 
====Comments====
 
  
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
[[Category:Wikisimpsons|{{PAGENAME}}]]
+
[[Category:Wikisimpsons]]
 
[[Category:Comprehensive articles| ]]
 
[[Category:Comprehensive articles| ]]

Latest revision as of 08:23, July 27, 2024

Archive filingcabinent.png

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

This page is to nominate minor articles as being complete, or comprehensive articles.

What is a comprehensive article?[edit]

A comprehensive article is one that is complete with all its relevant information, but due to its slight size, cannot obtain Featured article status (our best work). The purpose of this project is to establish uniformity among Wikisimpsons, by seeing that all articles are, essentially, complete, with all their relevant material. Through this process, we mainly hope to let readers know when an article they are reading is complete, and not a "stub" (an article which has been denoted as lacking in information), though its size might suggest so. Episodes and regular and supporting characters cannot qualify as comprehensive articles, as they can obtain featured status. (For nominating these articles, see Wikisimpsons:Featured article.)

Criteria[edit]

An article must…

  1. …be well-written.
  2. …list all canon and non-canon appearances.
  3. …follow the Manual of Style and all other policies on Wikisimpsons.
  4. …not be tagged with any improvement tags (i.e. image needed, stub, etc).
  5. …have all canon (or non-canon if this is all there is) information presented.
  6. …be completely referenced.
  7. …have all image licenses fully filled-out.
  8. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  9. …include a "Behind the Laughter" section for real world information (if any).

Nominating process[edit]

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. If at the start of a month the article is the one with most support votes (and least oppose votes) it will be officially known as a "Comprehensive Article".

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (and the article has more support votes than any other nominated article), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the

template can be added to the top of its page.

  1. All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.

Note: Remember to sign your posts (~~~~).

Nominations[edit]

The Little Universe[edit]

A good, complete article for Halloween. The Solar Dragon 08:05, September 21, 2021 (EDT)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • I guess it already has been featured, since it has the Comp template. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)

Brotherhood of the Spectacles[edit]

Might fit as a comprehensive article. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]