Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Featured episode/Past Nominations 3"
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
*I've just cleaned up quotes tab! / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=chocolate><font face="Agency FB"><font size="3">Loco</font></font></font><font color=#00CC99><font face="Agency FB"><font size="3">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=grey><font face="Courier New">'''Talk'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|<font color=navy><font face="Century Gothic">Contribs</font></font>]])</sup> 12:43, May 16, 2015 (EDT) | *I've just cleaned up quotes tab! / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=chocolate><font face="Agency FB"><font size="3">Loco</font></font></font><font color=#00CC99><font face="Agency FB"><font size="3">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=grey><font face="Courier New">'''Talk'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|<font color=navy><font face="Century Gothic">Contribs</font></font>]])</sup> 12:43, May 16, 2015 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === "[[A Tale of Two Springfields]]" === | ||
+ | :Absolutely complete episode that is also a great episode itself. / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=EBAA14><font face="Agency FB"><font size="4">Loco</font></font></font><font color=00B2F0><font face="Agency FB"><font size="4">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=70E38C><font face="Courier New">'''TALK'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|<font color=FFB233><font face="Century Gothic">Contribs</font></font>]])</sup> 09:20, June 27, 2015 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Support (2) ==== | ||
+ | #Looks great. —[[User:Frederick|<big><font color="blue">Fred</font></big>]] (<small>[[User talk:Frederick|<font color="grey">Talk</font>]]</small> '''•''' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Frederick|<font color="red">Contribs.</font>]]</small>) 23:21, June 30, 2015 (EDT) | ||
+ | #Good article for a good episode. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator|talk]]) 01:02, July 30, 2015 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Neutral (0) ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Oppose (0) ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Comments ==== | ||
== Rejected == | == Rejected == |
Revision as of 02:32, August 1, 2015
All episodes that have been nominated for featured episode.
Contents
Passed
"Lisa the Iconoclast"
A complete episode, originally aired in February./13JThomas Talk / Contributions
Support (1)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (0)
Comments
"Kamp Krusty"
Surprised this hasn't been nominated yet. It has a fully developed and in-depth "general" tab, complete with a fleshed out plot overview and accompanying screenshots, as well as production and reception sections. All other tabs are completed to a similar standard. Definitely one of the best pages we have for an earlier episode. Deserves to be featured. --Effluvium (talk) 02:47, February 15, 2015 (EST)
Support (4)
- --Fred (Talk • Contribs.) 03:22, February 15, 2015 (EST)
- Why hasn't this episode been nominated until today!/ Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 09:30, February 15, 2015 (EST)
- --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 12:06, February 28, 2015 (EST)
- Yes, everything seems complete and well fleshed out. And a classic episode. The Solar Dragon 13:42, February 28, 2015 (EST)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (0)
Comments
"Milhouse Doesn't Live Here Anymore"
Support (0)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (0)
Comments
"Co-Dependent's Day"
I have done a considerable amount of work on this article, including a complete rework of the main article. I think it is ready now. The Solar Dragon 14:36, April 18, 2015 (EDT)
Support (1)
- I see no reason why this episode shouldn't be featured. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 08:41, April 19, 2015 (EDT)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (0)
Comments
"Four Regrettings and a Funeral"
Can't actually see anything wrong with this. Decent article. The Solar Dragon 14:20, May 31, 2015 (EDT)
Support (1)
- Excellent episode and also 100% complete. It fits perfectly. / Loco87 (Talk / Contribs) 15:12, May 31, 2015 (EDT)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (0)
Comments
"The Seemingly Never-Ending Story"
Support (4)
- It's a good article. --76.20.194.10 17:06, June 22, 2015 (EDT)
- I absolutely detest this episode, but the article is well-done and feature-worthy. -- Mythigator (talk) 11:50, June 27, 2015 (EDT)
- Cleaned up the references page. Could still do with a production/reception section, if there's any info to be found for such a section. Otherwise, I think it looks pretty good. --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 22:11, June 27, 2015 (EDT)
- Looking good. —Fred (Talk • Contribs.) 23:43, June 27, 2015 (EDT)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (0)
The Quotes tab needs to be cleaned up. Other than that, the article looks great. -- Mythigator (talk) 21:21, March 30, 2015 (EDT)
- Withdrawn. -- Mythigator (talk) 11:48, June 27, 2015 (EDT)
Comments
"A Tale of Two Springfields"
- Absolutely complete episode that is also a great episode itself. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 09:20, June 27, 2015 (EDT)
Support (2)
- Looks great. —Fred (Talk • Contribs.) 23:21, June 30, 2015 (EDT)
- Good article for a good episode. -- Mythigator (talk) 01:02, July 30, 2015 (EDT)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (0)
Comments
Rejected
"Simpsorama"
Support (0)
#An excellent episode. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 06:39, December 24, 2014 (EST)
Neutral (0)
Oppose (3)
- Needs a plot. The Solar Dragon 07:23, December 24, 2014 (EST)
- Yeah, needs a plot. --Fred (Talk • Contribs.) 04:59, January 3, 2015 (EST)
- It's true. It needs a plot. Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 13:39, January 3, 2015 (EST)