• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: A new episode title, “Convenience Airways”, has been announced!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: Even more Promotional Images for “Treehouse of Horror XXXV” have been released!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations"

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(Support (0))
m
 
(387 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| align="center" style="border:1px solid turquoise; background:#E0FFFF;  padding:10px; width: 100%;color: black;"
+
{| align="center" style="border:1px solid #{{DarkBox}}; background:#{{LightBox}};  padding:10px; width: 100%;color: black;"
 
|
 
|
 
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 2px solid #FFFFFF; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 15px; vertical-align: top;"
 
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 2px solid #FFFFFF; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 15px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 15px; vertical-align: top;"
 
|
 
|
{|align="right" style="text-align: center; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 20px; padding: 5px;"
+
{{Archivebox2|1=yes|2=yes|3=yes|4=yes|5=yes|6=yes}}
|<center>[[File:Archive filingcabinent.png|50px]]</center>
 
|-
 
|
 
'''Archives:''' [[Wikisimpsons:Comprehensive article nominations/Archive 1|1]]
 
 
 
|-
 
|__TOC__
 
|}
 
  
This page is to nominate minor articles as being ''complete,'' or '''comprehensive articles.'''
+
This page is to nominate minor articles as being complete, or '''comprehensive articles.'''
  
 
== What is a comprehensive article? ==
 
== What is a comprehensive article? ==
A '''comprehensive article''' is one that is complete with all its relevant information, but due to its slight size, cannot obtain '''''[[Wikisimpsons:Featured article|Featured article]]''''' status (our ''best'' work). The purpose of this project is to establish uniformity among Wikisimpsons, by seeing that all articles are, essentially, ''complete,'' with all their relevant material. Through this process, we mainly hope to '''''let readers know when an article they are reading is complete,''''' and not a "stub" (an article which has been denoted as lacking in information), though its size might suggest so. Episodes and regular and supporting characters cannot qualify as comprehensive articles, as they can obtain featured status. ''(For nominating these articles, see ''[[Wikisimpsons:Featured article]]''.)''
+
A comprehensive article is one that is complete with all its relevant information, but due to its slight size, cannot obtain [[Wikisimpsons:Featured article|Featured article]] status (our best work). The purpose of this project is to establish uniformity among Wikisimpsons, by seeing that all articles are, essentially, complete, with all their relevant material. Through this process, we mainly hope to let readers know when an article they are reading is complete, and not a "stub" (an article which has been denoted as lacking in information), though its size might suggest so. Episodes and regular and supporting characters cannot qualify as comprehensive articles, as they can obtain featured status. ''(For nominating these articles, see ''[[Wikisimpsons:Featured article]]''.)''
  
 
== Criteria ==
 
== Criteria ==
Line 37: Line 29:
 
#Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 
#Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 
#Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 
#Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
#If, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be officially known as a "comprehensive article".
+
#If at the start of a month the article is the one with most support votes (and least oppose votes) it will be officially known as a "Comprehensive Article".
  
 
<big>''How to vote:''</big>
 
<big>''How to vote:''</big>
Line 45: Line 37:
 
##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 
##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 
#As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 
#As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
#Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the <code><nowiki>{{comp}}</nowiki></code> template can be added to the top of its page.
+
#Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (and the article has more support votes than any other nominated article), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the '''<big>{{Icons|CA}}</big>''' template can be added to the top of its page.
 
#All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.
 
#All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.
  
Line 51: Line 43:
  
 
== Nominations ==
 
== Nominations ==
=== [[Opening Sequence]] ===
+
=== [[The Little Universe]] ===
A massive article, not likely to get featured though, that is full of pictures and information about each of the opening sequences. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 14:14, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
+
A good, complete article for Halloween. <span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span> 08:05, September 21, 2021 (EDT)
 
 
==== Support (4) ====
 
#Agreed. Has had a lot of work put into it... [[User:Effluvium|Effluvium]] 20:17, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
# Highly detailed. ----- It's Magic - [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 20:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Also agreed. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 
#Epic article. -- [[User:Lotito491|Lotito491]] 18:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
=== [[Gabbo]] ===
 
This is a fairly long article for a character who was only the focus of one episode. It has a picture, quote and is of decent length. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 20:13, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
==== Support (1) ====
 
#I love this article. A BIG yes from me! [[User:Effluvium|Effluvium]] 14:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
 
 
 
 
=== [[Lord Montymort]] ===
 
Great article for a character that's only made one non-canon appearance. Unlikely to get featured. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] 14:33 October 16th
 
 
 
==== Support (3) ====
 
#Looks good. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 12:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 
#Good, long article that probably isn't long enough to get featured. Had a lot of effort put into writing it. <span style="font-family:Australian Sunrise">[[User:Josegiraffio|'''<span style="color:red">Jose</span><span style="color:green">giraffio</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Josegiraffio|'''Want to talk''']]</sup></span> 13:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 
#Got my vote. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 10:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
 
 
=== [[Canyonero]] ===
 
A good article for a car and it has complete song lyrics as well. <span style="font-family:Australian Sunrise">[[User:Josegiraffio|'''<span style="color:red">Jose</span><span style="color:green">giraffio</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Josegiraffio|'''Want to talk''']]</sup></span> 10:42, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 
  
==== Support (2) ====
+
==== Support (0) ====
#Just updated it. Now looks good. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 12:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 
#Support. [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 13:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
  
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
Line 104: Line 53:
  
 
==== Comments ====
 
==== Comments ====
 +
*I guess it already has been featured, since it has the Comp template. / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=696969><font size="4"><font face="Agency FB">Loco</font></font></font><font color=4169E1><font face="Agency FB"><font size="4">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=Tomato><font face="Courier New">'''TALK'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|'''<font color=3CB371><font face="Century Gothic"><font size="2">Contribs</font></font></font>''']])</sup> 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)
  
=== ''[[The Re-Deadening]]'' ===
+
=== [[Brotherhood of the Spectacles]] ===
Long and detailed for a movie article, and has had more editors than just me putting a lot of work into it. I was working on it a little (since the local TV station just re-ran "[[The Ziff Who Came to Dinner]]"), and I'm convinced that the article now has everything that we know (or can reasonably conjecture) about the movie. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 10:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
+
Might fit as a comprehensive article. / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=696969><font size="4"><font face="Agency FB">Loco</font></font></font><font color=4169E1><font face="Agency FB"><font size="4">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=Tomato><font face="Courier New">'''TALK'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|'''<font color=3CB371><font face="Century Gothic"><font size="2">Contribs</font></font></font>''']])</sup> 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)
  
==== Support (2) ====
+
==== Support (0) ====
#A great article. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 11:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 
#It's one of our best. Great job, whoever worked on it. [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 13:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
  
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
Line 117: Line 65:
  
 
==== Comments ====
 
==== Comments ====
 
=== [[Springfield Lemon Tree]] ===
 
Everything you need to know is there. I say this article is complete. [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 14:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Support (2) ====
 
#Could do with a decent quote (possibly one of Grampa's about it) but otherwise it is fine. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 14:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
#Absolutely yes -- and I added a Grampa quote, BTW. This is a perfect example of an article not needing to be long to be complete. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 16:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
 
=== [[Cornelius Chapman]] ===
 
It's a small article, but it's all there. [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 14:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Support (2) ====
 
#Oh, forgot all about this article. Yes! A great article [[User:Effluvium|Effluvium]] 14:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
#Another great example of a short comprehensive article. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 17:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
 
==== Comments ====
 
They did have a sidebar about him in ''The Simpsons Beyond Forever!: A Complete Guide to Our Favorite Family...Still Continued''. Should that count as an appearance? [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 14:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
:It certainly should count as an appearance, and if the sidebar has any additional information about him, it should go into a non-canon section of the article. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 17:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
=== [[Mrs. Glick]] ===
 
A very good article. Simply complete. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] 18:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Support (1) ====
 
#A good complete article, and unlikely to be featured because it's short and because Mrs. Glick doesn't appear very often. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 19:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 
 
==== Neutral (0) ====
 
 
==== Oppose (0) ====
 
  
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
 
+
[[Category:Wikisimpsons]]
[[Category:Wikisimpsons|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
 
[[Category:Comprehensive articles| ]]
 
[[Category:Comprehensive articles| ]]

Latest revision as of 09:23, July 27, 2024

Archive filingcabinent.png

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

This page is to nominate minor articles as being complete, or comprehensive articles.

What is a comprehensive article?[edit]

A comprehensive article is one that is complete with all its relevant information, but due to its slight size, cannot obtain Featured article status (our best work). The purpose of this project is to establish uniformity among Wikisimpsons, by seeing that all articles are, essentially, complete, with all their relevant material. Through this process, we mainly hope to let readers know when an article they are reading is complete, and not a "stub" (an article which has been denoted as lacking in information), though its size might suggest so. Episodes and regular and supporting characters cannot qualify as comprehensive articles, as they can obtain featured status. (For nominating these articles, see Wikisimpsons:Featured article.)

Criteria[edit]

An article must…

  1. …be well-written.
  2. …list all canon and non-canon appearances.
  3. …follow the Manual of Style and all other policies on Wikisimpsons.
  4. …not be tagged with any improvement tags (i.e. image needed, stub, etc).
  5. …have all canon (or non-canon if this is all there is) information presented.
  6. …be completely referenced.
  7. …have all image licenses fully filled-out.
  8. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  9. …include a "Behind the Laughter" section for real world information (if any).

Nominating process[edit]

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. If at the start of a month the article is the one with most support votes (and least oppose votes) it will be officially known as a "Comprehensive Article".

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (and the article has more support votes than any other nominated article), the article will be officially known as a "comprehensive article", and the

template can be added to the top of its page.

  1. All nominations must be put at the bottom of the page.

Note: Remember to sign your posts (~~~~).

Nominations[edit]

The Little Universe[edit]

A good, complete article for Halloween. The Solar Dragon 08:05, September 21, 2021 (EDT)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • I guess it already has been featured, since it has the Comp template. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)

Brotherhood of the Spectacles[edit]

Might fit as a comprehensive article. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 17:10, February 7, 2023 (EST)

Support (0)[edit]

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]