Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Pages for deletion"

Revision as of 07:06, October 14, 2015

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Contents 1 Creating an PfD discussion 1.1 Example Page 2 Nominations 2.1 The Samsonadzes 2.2 Lisa Comics In The UK 2.3 Liquor Store 2.4 Tinker Bell

Pages for deletion (PfD) is where editors discuss whether a page should be deleted. Articles listed are normally discussed for at least five days after which the deletion process proceeds based on community consensus. Then the page may be kept, merged or redirected, moved to another title or deleted.

Creating an PfD discussion

If you want to create a deletion discussion simply list in the nominations section:

Example Page

Reason for Deletion ~~~~

Nominations

The Samsonadzes

Not actually a version of The Simpsons, just an animated show ripping off The Simpsons. Don't think it deserves an article. Also, the article is just taken from Wikipedia. The Solar Dragon 07:23, October 7, 2015 (EDT)

• Concur. This one should have a mention in "References in other media", but doesn't deserve its own article. -- Mythigator (talk) 10:16, October 11, 2015 (EDT)
  • Yeah, the fact it's basically a rip-off is really the only point of relevancy to the article. Agree with Mythigator. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 20:21, October 12, 2015 (EDT)
    • Agree. FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Lisa Comics In The UK

No actual Lisa Comics in the UK. The story was in Simpsons Comics. The Solar Dragon 09:45, October 11, 2015 (EDT)

• Agree. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 20:21, October 12, 2015 (EDT)
  • Agree. FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)
    • Disagree it was released before it was reprinted in 2002 in Simpsons comics (Just needs to be added that there was a lisa comic before being reprinted) Dylan^Talk 07:00, October 14, 2015 (EDT)
      • Do you have a source for this? i.e. actually owning the comic or have an image of the comic at all? I can't find anything on Google. The Solar Dragon 07:06, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Liquor Store

Mentioned only in the script. It shouldn't have an article. Not only is it mentioned only, it never was mentioned in the episode. The Solar Dragon 10:31, October 11, 2015 (EDT)

• Agree. This article is pretty unnecessary. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 20:21, October 12, 2015 (EDT)
  • Agree. FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Tinker Bell

FatHomerTalk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

I disagree. We have articles for merely mentioned characters so this can stay. The Solar Dragon 06:42, October 14, 2015 (EDT)