Wikisimpsons:Pages for deletion
Pages for deletion (PfD) is where editors discuss whether a page should be deleted. Articles listed are normally discussed for at least five days after which the deletion process proceeds based on community consensus. Then the page may be kept, merged or redirected, moved to another title or deleted.
Contents
Creating an PfD discussion
If you want to create a deletion discussion simply list in the nominations section:
Example Page
Reason for Deletion ~~~~
Nominations
Springfield Nuclear Power Plant employee (Simpson and Delilah)
Lack of notability. Said one line. Wasn't seen clearly. The Solar Dragon 06:48, 28 January 2012 (EST)
- (This is my response to both the employees) Sounds like they only say a few words each, so yeah I'd say delete. --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 13:00, 28 January 2012 (EST)
- I disagree, it should get a better image. FatHomerTalk 14:48, 28 January 2012 (EST)
- Disagree - We have named characters who do as little or less then this.--Cook879 15:16, 28 January 2012 (EST)
- The difference is, this character is unnamed. Bring this up on the talk page of Wikisimpsons:Notability. Solar Dragon (Talk • Contribs.) 15:30, 28 January 2012 (EST)
- Disagree - We have named characters who do as little or less then this.--Cook879 15:16, 28 January 2012 (EST)
- I disagree, it should get a better image. FatHomerTalk 14:48, 28 January 2012 (EST)
Springfield Nuclear Power Plant employee (Life on the Fast Lane)
Lack of notability, said one line. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 06:49, 28 January 2012 (EST)
Little Monty
Does this one dog really need it's own article, especially when none of the other puppies have their own? Seems like it should just be a redirect or they should all have pages. --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 18:18, 6 February 2012 (EST)
- Disagree. Little Monty is distinct from the other puppies, the same way that Surly Duff is distinct from the other Duffs. There's enough information specifically about Surly and about Little Monty to warrant them having their own articles, even though there's not enough to make individual articles about the other members of the groups they belong to. -- Mythigator 09:08, 9 February 2012 (EST)
- Disagree. More emphasis was placed on him than the others. The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.) 10:19, 9 February 2012 (EST)
Rudy Giuliani
He actually didn't guest star on The Simpsons, so I don't think it needs an article. --Fred (Talk) 03:32, 9 February 2012 (EST)
- Disagree. He did appear when the episode ran in syndication. The guest star and character articles should both stay, but one or the other should have a BtL note about the circumstances of Giulani's not appearing in the episode's first run. -- Mythigator 09:05, 9 February 2012 (EST)
- Disagree. What Mythigator said. The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.) 10:19, 9 February 2012 (EST)
