• Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Wikisimpsons:Bureaucracy requests/Cook879

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
< Wikisimpsons:Bureaucracy requests
Revision as of 11:06, September 21, 2011 by TheUnderfaker (talk | contribs) (Support (7))

Request

Cook879 is a great admin and I believe that he should be promoted to bureaucrat. He is a very active user and created loads of pages. He has helped superbly in the running of this wiki since he joined. He has also reverted lots of vandalism. Has all the qualities of a 'crat. Doh5678 (talk) 13:18, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

Support (7)

  1. I agree with Doh5678, Cook879 is a great user that deserves bureaucracy rights. Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans! 13:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  2. An obvious choice. He's the greatest contributor after Solar. FatHomerTalk 15:57, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  3. Doh summed it up! --Will k (Talk ~ Contributions) 18:46, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  4. For all the same reasons above! --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 20:44, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  5. Yes! --Smiley12 21:13, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  6. Okay then. I put this off as I was trying to think about what to say. Cook879 is a great user. One of the best we have. And while I am semi-active due to wanting to talk to people more than I want to edit, I think Cook will be a great replacement for me. He's a good user who makes repetitive edits, he knows policies, is loved by the community, has lots of edits, has had a presence on the wiki for even longer than me and best of all, he knows what he's doing. Therefore, I support this nomination and fully throw my support behind him. The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.) 03:33, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
  7. The only question I had was, "Do we need another bureaucrat?" Solar's support vote pretty much addressed that, so I also support the nomination. -- Mythigator 09:32, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
  8. Yes, a good user - would make a great bureaucrat. TheUnderfaker 12:06, 21 September 2011 (EDT)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (0)

Comments

I accept the nomination :)--Cook879 14:43, 16 September 2011 (EDT)