Wikisimpsons:Pages for deletion/Archive 4

Deletion discussions archive.

Kenny McCormick

Never appeared, only referenced. The Solar Dragon 16:32, October 17, 2015 (EDT)

• Agreed should be deleted Dylan^Talk 16:41, October 17, 2015 (EDT)
  • Totally agreed. Only referenced so: Delete. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 16:52, October 17, 2015 (EDT)

The Samsonadzes

Not actually a version of The Simpsons, just an animated show ripping off The Simpsons. Don't think it deserves an article. Also, the article is just taken from Wikipedia. The Solar Dragon 07:23, October 7, 2015 (EDT)

• Concur. This one should have a mention in "References in other media", but doesn't deserve its own article. -- Mythigator (talk) 10:16, October 11, 2015 (EDT)
  • Yeah, the fact it's basically a rip-off is really the only point of relevancy to the article. Agree with Mythigator. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 20:21, October 12, 2015 (EDT)
    • Agree. FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)
      • Agree. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 07:12, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Liquor Store

Mentioned only in the script. It shouldn't have an article. Not only is it mentioned only, it never was mentioned in the episode. The Solar Dragon 10:31, October 11, 2015 (EDT)

• Agree. This article is pretty unnecessary. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 20:21, October 12, 2015 (EDT)
  • Agree. FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)
    • Agree. Unnecessary article. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 07:12, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Tinker Bell

FatHomerTalk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

I disagree. We have articles for merely mentioned characters so this can stay. The Solar Dragon 06:42, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

But it's just Lisa dressed as tinker bell, not a new character. Isn't it better to write under the trivia tab that Lisa was dressed as tinker bell? FatHomer^Talk 07:29, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

But since Tinker Bell is a real-world character, it's basically the same as mentioning any other real-world celebrity. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 11:16, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Simpson's TV

Don't think this is notable for an article. The Solar Dragon 04:41, October 21, 2015 (EDT)

But I created it as a good article, and you deleting it may not be good, as I could still improve it. Acooldude 18:18, October 21, 2015 (EDT)

I agree with Solar. It's not quite notable. But everything can be discussed. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 07:43, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

If we have an article for the TV, what's to stop us having an article for the couch? The dinner table? Kitchen sink? The front door? The fridge? Homer and Marge's bed? The main bathroom toilet? It's an item of furniture, just like all of those. The Solar Dragon 11:53, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

I like that idea, Mr. Solar Dragon Sir. I'll do it! But other users can help me though. Acooldude 18:21, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

I'm not quite good at identifying sarcasm but I think Solar's comment was sarcastic. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 18:28, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

Yes, it was sarcasm. After reading his reply, I didn't just facepalm, I almost smashed my head into my desk in frustration. lol. The Solar Dragon 18:37, October 22, 2015 (EDT)