Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Pages for deletion/Archive 4"

Revision as of 05:46, December 28, 2015

Deletion discussions archive.

Concur. This one should have a mention in "References in other media", but doesn't deserve its own article. -- Mythigator (talk) 10:16, October 11, 2015 (EDT)
- Yeah, the fact it's basically a rip-off is really the only point of relevancy to the article. Agree with Mythigator. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 20:21, October 12, 2015 (EDT)
  - Agree. FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)
    - Agree. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 07:12, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Liquor Store

Mentioned only in the script. It shouldn't have an article. Not only is it mentioned only, it never was mentioned in the episode. The Solar Dragon 10:31, October 11, 2015 (EDT)

Agree. This article is pretty unnecessary. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 20:21, October 12, 2015 (EDT)
- Agree. FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)
  - Agree. Unnecessary article. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 07:12, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Tinker Bell

FatHomer^Talk 06:17, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

I disagree. We have articles for merely mentioned characters so this can stay. The Solar Dragon 06:42, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

But it's just Lisa dressed as tinker bell, not a new character. Isn't it better to write under the trivia tab that Lisa was dressed as tinker bell? FatHomer^Talk 07:29, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

But since Tinker Bell is a real-world character, it's basically the same as mentioning any other real-world celebrity. --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 11:16, October 14, 2015 (EDT)

Simpson's TV

Don't think this is notable for an article. The Solar Dragon 04:41, October 21, 2015 (EDT)

But I created it as a good article, and you deleting it may not be good, as I could still improve it. Acooldude 18:18, October 21, 2015 (EDT)

I agree with Solar. It's not quite notable. But everything can be discussed. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 07:43, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

If we have an article for the TV, what's to stop us having an article for the couch? The dinner table? Kitchen sink? The front door? The fridge? Homer and Marge's bed? The main bathroom toilet? It's an item of furniture, just like all of those. The Solar Dragon 11:53, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

I like that idea, Mr. Solar Dragon Sir. I'll do it! But other users can help me though. Acooldude 18:21, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

I'm not quite good at identifying sarcasm but I think Solar's comment was sarcastic. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 18:28, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

Yes, it was sarcasm. After reading his reply, I didn't just facepalm, I almost smashed my head into my desk in frustration. lol. The Solar Dragon 18:37, October 22, 2015 (EDT)

List of Bart Simpson Annuals in the UK

All the annuals are the same in the UK as the US. There is no need for a separate article about the UK annuals. The Solar Dragon 10:02, November 6, 2015 (EST)

True, but where is the article about the annuals then?? Dylan - Talk^Contribs 10:23, November 6, 2015 (EST)

There should be one. If not, then maybe not a delete, but a rewrite and a move should be done instead. The Solar Dragon 10:32, November 6, 2015 (EST)

Okay then going to rewrite it. Dylan - Talk^Contribs 10:35, November 6, 2015 (EST)

Does it seem fine now? Dylan - Talk^Contribs 10:49, November 6, 2015 (EST)

The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror (UK)

Not a UK series. All comics listed are part of the Simpsons Comics UK series. The Solar Dragon 13:44, November 2, 2015 (EST)

There was treehouse of horror comics, havent had chance to put them on the page yet, was getting round to it some point soon but been doing other countries comics Dylan - Talk^Contribs 14:08, November 2, 2015 (EST)

Well, it should be added to the page and all Simpsons Comics issues should be removed from the page. The entire page needs a rewrite if that's the case. The Solar Dragon 14:19, November 2, 2015 (EST)

Radioactive Man 80pg. 1 (UK)

Not a comic in the UK, according to the article. It just lists the issues that had stories that were published in the US comic. This shouldn't have an article as a result. The Solar Dragon 10:41, November 4, 2015 (EST)

Agreed Dylan - Talk^Contribs 10:42, November 4, 2015 (EST)

Weapons

Very pointless page. The notable weapons will get their own articles. Unnotable ones won't. Simples. The Solar Dragon 12:30, November 6, 2015 (EST)

Agreed. It's also rather vague. You could use practically anything as a weapon if you're resourceful enough. :P --Nick97 ^{(talk ~ contribs)} 15:23, November 6, 2015 (EST)

File:Covercraft - Bart(picture).PNG

It's not an actual "nudity scene". That picture appears in almost every episode. We would have to "re-watch" every episode and upload the scenes from each episode where the picture appears. / Loco87 ^{( / Contribs)} 07:18, November 11, 2015 (EST)

It's not really that necessary to re-watch over 500 episodes for one picture. It's mentioned now in the summary that it is "recurring". - EMarin121

Loco, the reason this image was added was because on the nudity section, episode 93 took the photo as "nudity", even though Marge was the main focus. Throughout the list, there are few with nude or diapered baby pictures and I figured those counted as part of every nude scene when searching. Please don't delete this.

- EMarin121

I personally believe that the entire article is stupid. However, it seems to generate us A LOT of hits (seriously, it's disturbing how many people get to the wiki by searching "Lisa Simpson nude" and the like...) so I'm for keeping the page. lol. BUT, I think that things like babies in "diapers", and most of the "semi-nudity" should be removed from the page. If we have it, it should focus solely on nudity. The Solar Dragon 13:53, November 23, 2015 (EST)

SNPP has a smilar page so we should keep the page, and it gives us visitors but I think we should remove this and other picture with underwear and other semi-nudity like diapers and Maggie topless in diaper images./AleWi (talk) 15:55, November 23, 2015 (EST)