• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 35 News: A Sneak Peek for “Bart’s Brain” has been released!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: A new episode title, “The Man Who Flew Too Much”, has been announced
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: A new episode title, “Bart’s Birthday”, has been announced
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Admin Requests"

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(TheHomer)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
=== Comments ===
 
=== Comments ===
 
+
*But in that month he made more than 3000 edits and did a lot of good things like improving most of the pages and creating templates. {{User:TheHomer/sig}} 01:38, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
==[[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]]==
 
==[[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]]==
Line 53: Line 50:
  
 
=== Comments ===
 
=== Comments ===
 +
*Mmmm... I think you're right. Plus Effluvium deserves it more than me. {{User:TheHomer/sig}} 01:38, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
  
 
= Previous =
 
= Previous =

Revision as of 21:38, June 18, 2010

The page to request admin rights.

Requirements

  • Users can nominate themselves.
  • Nominees must be a fairly active contributor to WikiSimpsons, being active at least in the last six weeks
    • As well, nominees ought to have more than 200 contributions, with at least 50% being in the mainspace.
  • Nominees should demonstrate good understanding of WikiSimpsons policies, style, and conventions.
  • Before a user is nominated, he or she must be asked if they will accept the nomination. If not, that user will not be nominated.
  • If a request is turned down, there must be at least a months wait before that user can be renominated.


Be aware that sockpuppeting or getting friends to vote in the last minute will not be tolerated.

Nominees

Effluvium

Support (5)

  1. Is a good user, knows the policies and has done a lot of work towards the wiki. The Solar Dragon 15:28, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
  2. You deserve it dude. - ThePlatypus 20:39, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Yep, good contributor, Third most edits on this wiki out of active people. --Smiley12 was here at 21:08, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Count me in for supporting Effluv. He's a good editor and a good egg to boot. -- Mythigator 23:34, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Yes, he would be a great administrator. — TheHomer (TalkContributions) 01:03, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

  1. I can't find any reason to oppose, but this user has only been here a month. -- Brian McClure 01:18, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose (0)

Comments

  • But in that month he made more than 3000 edits and did a lot of good things like improving most of the pages and creating templates. — TheHomer (TalkContributions) 01:38, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Mythigator

If no one objects, I'd like to throw my hat into the ring. -- Mythigator 23:34, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Support (0)

Neutral (1)

  1. I would recommend taking the first step to getting to be an admin, becoming a rollback first --Smiley12 was here at 00:34, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose (1)

    • Oppose per this edit. He later said "I don't remember where I saw it", so even if it was in good faith it shows very poor judgement skills. This could have easily been disproven by checking the end credits. You should never add something that you can't remember where you heard it. That is how vandalism spreads. -- Brian McClure 00:28, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

TheHomer

Like Mythigator said, if no one objects. It took me 20 minutes to write this, I'm nervous... just exaggerating, but I'd like to be an administrator. — TheHomer (TalkContributions) 01:03, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Support (1)

  1. Yeah, it would be nervous making an admin request, the thought that it would get turned down (I never had to do it though, I was made a rollback, then an admin without having to request anything, or even asking), But I'm sure you'll get accepted though. --Smiley12 was here at 01:16, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral (0)

Oppose (1)

  1. Adminship is not a badge of honour. You have not given us any reason why we should make you an admin. Sure, you've been a good contributor, but you haven't been here long and you really haven't displayed a need for the tools. -- Brian McClure 01:24, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Mmmm... I think you're right. Plus Effluvium deserves it more than me. — TheHomer (TalkContributions) 01:38, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Previous

Accepted

Rejected