User talk:NGMan62
Welcome!
 Hello, NGMan62, and welcome to Wikisimpsons! Thank you for taking an interest in our wiki. If you have any troubles, feel free to ask questions on my talk page or any other any experienced editors' talk page. Also, you could look at a help page. Here are a few pages to help out new editors such as yourself:
Please sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your name and the date. Signing your comments is important, as it lets other editors know who has posted which comments. Again, welcome! ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 20:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
Template:Seasons
Hi, this is the style I plan on putting all around the wiki. All the templates will be the same colour and style. Please don't change these. Thanks, ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 21:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- As you wish. I just don't like the way you made it look.-- NGMan62 TalkContributions 21:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I used exactly the same colours and styling as used in the infoboxes to keep a sense of continuity going on the wiki. I thought that if we co-ordinated these, it would seem more professional. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 22:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes but #FADA00 and #FFF4A7 seem to be used prominently around the wiki. I suppose we should opt for the template's colours instead?-- NGMan62 TalkContributions 22:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I used exactly the same colours and styling as used in the infoboxes to keep a sense of continuity going on the wiki. I thought that if we co-ordinated these, it would seem more professional. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 22:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Richmond References?
What's up with all the "Richmond" references at the end of each Season 2 episode summary? -- Mythigator 23:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know. I just put them up for references as they are claimed to be so by Wikipedia. -- NGMan62 TalkContributions 01:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- You can (and should) do away with the ones at the ends of the episode summaries. The basic information about the episodes (title, production number, date, guest stars, etc.) doesn't need to be sourced (it isn't in the wiki's episode articles). Placing those references at the ends of the summaries makes it look like we're getting those summary write-ups from another source, which is not true. Besides that, there's no full explanation for what the "Richmond" source is. So ... #1 needs a full citation (not just "Richmond" and a page number); 2 through 5 can stay as they are; #6 needs a full citation; and the rest can be deleted. -- Mythigator 01:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorted although some citations have been replaced for more references.-- NGMan62 TalkContributions 15:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Looks great. Nicely done! -- Mythigator 16:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorted although some citations have been replaced for more references.-- NGMan62 TalkContributions 15:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- You can (and should) do away with the ones at the ends of the episode summaries. The basic information about the episodes (title, production number, date, guest stars, etc.) doesn't need to be sourced (it isn't in the wiki's episode articles). Placing those references at the ends of the summaries makes it look like we're getting those summary write-ups from another source, which is not true. Besides that, there's no full explanation for what the "Richmond" source is. So ... #1 needs a full citation (not just "Richmond" and a page number); 2 through 5 can stay as they are; #6 needs a full citation; and the rest can be deleted. -- Mythigator 01:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
