User talk:Solar Dragon/Archive 6
 |
Character Tabs
Seeing as we are both against the idea of the Character Tab System, shall I remove the template from the pages its been inserted on. I'm not sure how Kingcjc will respond, if he'll be happy with the idea or not?, but, shall I go ahead? Effluvium talk contributions email 18:11, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, go ahead and remove them. Revert the articles back to their last changes as well. ☆The Solar Dragon 20:14, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- OK. Will do! :) Effluvium talk contributions email 20:16, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
Well done, ol' boy!
I saw one of your edited pages, and I was impressed! Kepp up the good work. TFwriter 23:58, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, I'm trying to boost my points too. Actually, maybe we should have rules on this achievement system. --Smiley12 was here at 03:07, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Putting up some new pages and wondering how to insert the character information window. Is there an easy way to do it? Natron82 04:05, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Redesigning articles of Guest Stars playing as themselves
For articles of guest stars playing as themselves, do you think it would be better if we separated the real life information of a guest star from the information only appearing in the show? For example, in one section we can put in the real life biography of the guest star while in another section we can put in the guest star's history within the show. Ldude893 16:11, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I would prefer two separate articles, one for the actor, one for the character. we used this style on Futurama Wiki. It should be Name (character) and Name (voice actor). I brought up this before but it was suggested they be put together. Lets ask again though, it will also improve our article count and if we can get good length voice actor pages, that would be great. ☆The Solar Dragon 16:14, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Im happy with this. So similar to what has been done with the Matt Groening article? Effluvium talk contributions email 16:16, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
antomously voting
I know that we as editirs can vote but can people that dont sign up can they still vote locke97 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Locke97 (talk • contribs) 19:20, July 16, 2010
- Of course they can. They should have a say in what they want to see on the main page too. ☆The Solar Dragon 18:32, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
"Buddies" with Simpsons Crazy
Hi. Did you email Simpsons Crazy after about our request to be "buddies" with them? I've seen Smiley's design of the button and it looks great. If we do this, it will open up a world of new editors, hopefully, fingers crossed. Effluvium talk contributions email 22:22, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I have emailed them. No reply yet. I emailed them yesterday I think. ☆The Solar Dragon 22:23, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- OK. In the words of Homer Simpson - "Now we play the waiting game." :) Effluvium talk contributions email 22:26, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Badges
I dont really get them but i need to write here to get a badge so i am —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScarletScarabX (talk • contribs) 08:48, July 17, 2010
- You don't need to write here. You want to get the badge. This is actually counted as spamming you know. ☆The Solar Dragon 07:50, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Really then ill ask a real question are you gonna ban me for that? im really sorry for it. ScarletScarabX (Talk) 07:56, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry I didn't know the rule I know for now on. Thanx for letting me know though. User:Coreman7658
Shorts
What is the rule for the Ullman shorts regarding categories? They aren't episodes of The Simpsons, so do they belong in episode-specific categories like Category:Religion-themed episodes? -- Brian McClure 15:43, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. I guess that they count so they could go in the categories. What do you think then? ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:44, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the two may be about the same characters, but they are quite different in terms of content, themes, staff, etc. As such, they probably don't belong in the categories reserved for episodes of the show, because if we add shorts, why not comics, video games, etc.? Of course, that means that a new series of short-specific categories would be needed, which would just end up complicating things. Still, when one of 48 Ullman shorts has a religious theme (and even then, I'd hardly call "The Pagans" a "religious episode"), is a "Religion-themed shorts" category really necessary? So, I think we should keep the shorts out of the episode categories, but not go crazy creating a bunch of new ones. After all, they are just shorts. -- Brian McClure 15:54, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Another Episode Title Issue
Got another episode with two versions of its title floating around: Eeny Teeny Maya, Moe -- both with and without the comma following "Maya." It looks like Brian McClure just recently made the title change (adding the comma), so he may be in the process of changing the page titles for the episode's other tabs. Before I noticed the discrepancy, I created a References tab with the comma in the episode title, but it can be deleted as there's already a nicely-developed References tab for the "no comma" episode title. -- Mythigator 15:51, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- all sorted. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 15:57, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Nicely done. -- Mythigator 15:58, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Season 22
Solar Dragon, it would be great to stop reverting my edits. In my edits, the Treehouse of Horror and Elementary School Musical (which was acting weird) have a clear space. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.238.134 (talk) 17:38, July 18, 2010
- I only made it look like the others in the sake of continuity on the page. And, it would be great if you don't talk to me like that. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 17:41, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
What? I am just suggesting something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.238.134 (talk) 17:51, July 18, 2010
