Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Pages for deletion"

Revision as of 15:06, April 5, 2012

Pages for deletion (PfD) is where editors discuss whether a page should be deleted. Articles listed are normally discussed for at least five days after which the deletion process proceeds based on community consensus. Then the page may be kept, merged or redirected, moved to another title or deleted.

Creating an PfD discussion

If you want to create a deletion discussion simply list in the nominations section:

Example Page

Reason for Deletion ~~~~

Discussion goes below

Nominations

List of Other Media References in The Simpsons

Will be hard to keep up to date fully. Ambiguous. Will most likely always be incomplete. We have references pages for this reason. ☆The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)}☆ 17:01, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

Cultural references: Television

Will be hard to keep up to date fully. Will most likely always be incomplete. We have references pages for this reason. ☆The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)}☆ 17:01, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

Cultural references: Books

If we're not having a page for the television references, books should go too for similar reasons. ☆The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)}☆ 17:01, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

1

I'm opposing, of course, as there are also characters like Number One. |

| Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 13:18, 4 April 2012 (EDT)

Delete: The article's pointless. We don't want articles for numbers. We'll have around 500 number articles by the time all the number articles will be done. ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 13:21, 4 April 2012 (EDT)

I think we shouldn't have all the number articles, just ones with extra things that are related to the number. Number One was one of the main reasons I created this article. |

| Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 13:24, 4 April 2012 (EDT)

Oh, right. I'm Keep then. Should the delete template be removed? ~ Phinbart (talk • contribs) 13:41, 4 April 2012 (EDT)

If we have Number One and others with "One" or "1" in their names, then the page can stay. Having all the number pages is pointless though. The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 13:43, 4 April 2012 (EDT)

Maggie's Imaginary Future House

Pretty pointless as it could have been 742 Evergreen Terrace anyway. And the image is terrible, only showing a massive image of Maggie. I just don't think it's good enough to have an article. | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 05:20, 5 April 2012 (EDT)

Agree. This was made in the period where people went: "Let's make an article about everything, no matter how minor it is!". The Solar Dragon ^{(Talk - Contribs.)} 05:41, 5 April 2012 (EDT)

Me too. Also, pretty bad quality of an article. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 05:47, 5 April 2012 (EDT)

If that article is deleted should these also be deleted: Bart's Imaginary Hell and Imaginary Funeral Parlor. FatHomer^Talk 15:06, 5 April 2012 (EDT)