Difference between revisions of "Blog:Tabs on commercial pages"

Revision as of 10:24, February 5, 2015

So, we have tabs on commercial pages, i.e. Piggy Bank. I don't believe we should for several reasons:

1. Most of the tabs will never be long or may not even get any information.
2. References can only have one or two points, may as well go in the article.
3. Pages are small enough without tabs. Just merge them all together.

What does everyone else think? The Solar Dragon 07:45, February 5, 2015 (EST)

I like the tabs because

1. They have dialog
2. They have some times a references
3. They have appearances

/AleWi (talk) 08:43, February 5, 2015 (EST)

Those things can all be merged into the main articles, which are usually tiny. The Solar Dragon 09:04, February 5, 2015 (EST)

We could have a tab template for commercials consisting only of "General", "Appearances", "References" and maybe "quotes" too. / Loco87 ^{(TALK / Contribs)} 09:46, February 5, 2015 (EST)

I still think those pages will be too tiny to be necessary. We can easily merge them all into one page. The Solar Dragon 09:47, February 5, 2015 (EST)

Well, if they are too tiny they should be merged. Maybe the "appearances" tab should stay (but only if there's a considerable amount of appearances in a commercial). / Loco87 ^{(TALK / Contribs)} 10:24, February 5, 2015 (EST)