• New article from the Springfield Shopper: The Simpsons are trapped on a flight from Hell this December!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: A Sneak Peek for “Treehouse of Horror Presents: Simpsons Wicked This Way Comes” has been released!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: Even more Preview Images for “O C’mon All Ye Faithful” have been released!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Bureaucracy requests/Cook879"

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(Created page with "Cook879 is a great admin and I believe that he should be promoted to bureaucrat. He is a very active user and created loads of pages. He has helped superbly in the running of thi...")
 
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Passed}}
 +
 +
== Request ==
 
Cook879 is a great admin and I believe that he should be promoted to bureaucrat. He is a very active user and created loads of pages. He has helped superbly in the running of this wiki since he joined. He has also reverted lots of vandalism. Has all the qualities of a 'crat. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] ([[User talk:Doh5678|talk]]) 13:18, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 
Cook879 is a great admin and I believe that he should be promoted to bureaucrat. He is a very active user and created loads of pages. He has helped superbly in the running of this wiki since he joined. He has also reverted lots of vandalism. Has all the qualities of a 'crat. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] ([[User talk:Doh5678|talk]]) 13:18, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  
== Support (0) ==
+
=== Support (10) ===
 +
# I agree with [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]], [[User:Cook879|Cook879]] is a great user that deserves bureaucracy rights. [[User:Phinbart|Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans!]] 13:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#An obvious choice. He's the greatest contributor after Solar. [[User:FatHomer|<b><span style="color: teal">FatHomer</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:FatHomer|Talk]]</sup> 15:57, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#Doh summed it up! --[[User:Will k|'''Will k''']] ([[User talk:Will k|Talk]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Will k|Contributions]]) 18:46, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#For all the same reasons above! --[[User:Nick97|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97|<font color=darkturquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup>  20:44, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#Yes! --[[User:Smiley12|Smiley12]] 21:13, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#Okay then. I put this off as I was trying to think about what to say. Cook879 is a great user. One of the best we have. And while I am semi-active due to wanting to talk to people more than I want to edit, I think Cook will be a great replacement for me. He's a good user who makes repetitive edits, he knows policies, is loved by the community, has lots of edits, has had a presence on the wiki for even longer than me and best of all, he knows what he's doing. Therefore, I support this nomination and fully throw my support behind him. <span style="font-family:AR Darling">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:black">The</span> <span style="color:blue">Solar</span> <span style="color:red">Dragon</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:bgreen">Talk</span>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|Contribs.]])</sup></span> 03:33, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#The only question I had was, "Do we need another bureaucrat?" Solar's support vote pretty much addressed that, so I also support the nomination. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 09:32, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#Yes, a good user - would make a great bureaucrat. [[User:TheUnderfaker|TheUnderfaker]] 12:06, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#[[User:AleWi|AleWi]] 13:09, 23 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
#<font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:DaRanger|<span font="Comic Sans MS"; style="color: #339900; text-shadow:1px 1px 1px silver;">DaRanger</span>]]</font> <sup>([[User talk:DaRanger|<span font="Friz Quadrata"; style="color: silver;">Talk</span>]])</sup> 14:48, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
=== Neutral (0) ===
  
== Neutral (0) ==
+
=== Oppose (0) ===
  
== Oppose (0) ==
+
=== Comments ===
 +
I accept the nomination :)--[[User:Cook879|Cook879]] 14:43, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  
== Comments ==
+
[[Category:Wikisimpsons - Previous Nominations|Cook879]]

Latest revision as of 11:24, January 18, 2012

Green tick.png This nomination is closed and was successful. The user in question was granted the powers.

Request[edit]

Cook879 is a great admin and I believe that he should be promoted to bureaucrat. He is a very active user and created loads of pages. He has helped superbly in the running of this wiki since he joined. He has also reverted lots of vandalism. Has all the qualities of a 'crat. Doh5678 (talk) 13:18, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

Support (10)[edit]

  1. I agree with Doh5678, Cook879 is a great user that deserves bureaucracy rights. Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans! 13:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  2. An obvious choice. He's the greatest contributor after Solar. FatHomerTalk 15:57, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  3. Doh summed it up! --Will k (Talk ~ Contributions) 18:46, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  4. For all the same reasons above! --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 20:44, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  5. Yes! --Smiley12 21:13, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
  6. Okay then. I put this off as I was trying to think about what to say. Cook879 is a great user. One of the best we have. And while I am semi-active due to wanting to talk to people more than I want to edit, I think Cook will be a great replacement for me. He's a good user who makes repetitive edits, he knows policies, is loved by the community, has lots of edits, has had a presence on the wiki for even longer than me and best of all, he knows what he's doing. Therefore, I support this nomination and fully throw my support behind him. The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.) 03:33, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
  7. The only question I had was, "Do we need another bureaucrat?" Solar's support vote pretty much addressed that, so I also support the nomination. -- Mythigator 09:32, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
  8. Yes, a good user - would make a great bureaucrat. TheUnderfaker 12:06, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
  9. AleWi 13:09, 23 September 2011 (EDT)
  10. DaRanger (Talk) 14:48, 25 September 2011 (EDT)

Neutral (0)[edit]

Oppose (0)[edit]

Comments[edit]

I accept the nomination :)--Cook879 14:43, 16 September 2011 (EDT)