Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Admin Requests/Mythigator"
Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
Solar Dragon (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#I would recommend taking the first step to getting to be an admin, becoming a rollback first --[[User:Smiley12#|Smiley]][[User talk:Smiley12#|12]] was here at 00:34, June 19, 2010 (UTC) | #I would recommend taking the first step to getting to be an admin, becoming a rollback first --[[User:Smiley12#|Smiley]][[User talk:Smiley12#|12]] was here at 00:34, June 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
=== Oppose (1) === | === Oppose (1) === | ||
| − | #*'''Oppose''' per | + | #*'''Oppose''' per this edit. He later said "I don't remember where I saw it", so even if it was in good faith it shows very poor judgement skills. This could have easily been disproven by checking the end credits. You should never add something that you can't remember where you heard it. That is how vandalism spreads. -- [[User:Brian McClure|Brian McClure]] 00:28, June 19, 2010 (UTC) |
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
McClure - That's one freaking instance where I goofed, out of plenty of other changes I've made with no issues at all. You might cut me some slack for owning up to my mistakes. Smiley - If rollback is a more logical step then going to directly to admin, that's entirely understandable and OK by me. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 02:08, June 19, 2010 (UTC) | McClure - That's one freaking instance where I goofed, out of plenty of other changes I've made with no issues at all. You might cut me some slack for owning up to my mistakes. Smiley - If rollback is a more logical step then going to directly to admin, that's entirely understandable and OK by me. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 02:08, June 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:10, December 23, 2011
|
This nomination is closed and was unsuccessful. The reason for this is: 1 neutral, 1 oppose, 0 support |
Mythigator (withdrawn)[edit]
If no one objects, I'd like to throw my hat into the ring. -- Mythigator 23:34, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
WITHDRAWN after reading McClure's blog entry "Adminship is not a badge of honour." He has a good point, and it would have been nice to know that from the very beginning. Sorry if I've put anyone to any trouble. -- Mythigator 02:22, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
Support (0)[edit]
Neutral (1)[edit]
- I would recommend taking the first step to getting to be an admin, becoming a rollback first --Smiley12 was here at 00:34, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose (1)[edit]
- Oppose per this edit. He later said "I don't remember where I saw it", so even if it was in good faith it shows very poor judgement skills. This could have easily been disproven by checking the end credits. You should never add something that you can't remember where you heard it. That is how vandalism spreads. -- Brian McClure 00:28, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments[edit]
McClure - That's one freaking instance where I goofed, out of plenty of other changes I've made with no issues at all. You might cut me some slack for owning up to my mistakes. Smiley - If rollback is a more logical step then going to directly to admin, that's entirely understandable and OK by me. -- Mythigator 02:08, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
- It may be one edit, but why should I trust you with the ability to delete pages when you make a huge mistake like that (especially when it's very easy to fact check)? Your hostile response doesn't help you either. -- Brian McClure 02:16, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
- One wrong credit is a huge mistake? Interesting assessment, but not entirely unfair. Point taken and "name in hat" withdrawn. -- Mythigator 02:20, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Definitely, it's spreading vandalism. As an admin, one of your most important jobs would be cleaning up vandalism, so why should I trust you with that when you can't pick out obvious vandalism? -- Brian McClure 02:25, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
