• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: A new episode title, “Ladies Night”, has been announced, also announcing the season 36 premiere episode!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 35 News: A Sneak Peek for “Bart’s Brain” has been released!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Forum:New template design

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
Revision as of 17:09, August 30, 2011 by Cook879 (talk | contribs) (Support (2))

Template:Forumheader User:Solar Dragon/ArticleTemplates

OK, for a while now, I've been looking for a better template design as improvement templates are taking up a lot of space on articles. I therefore propose that we start to use this design User:Solar Dragon/ArticleTemplates. You can see it in action in the Sandbox. Best thing is that we can add as many templates into that as possible. Templates we don't need on an article don't show up etc. Hover over the images to see text. Only problem is that we can not add links in text, however, links can be added on the images.

If we go for this design, It will take a lot of effort to change all templates on the wiki but they will gradually be changed. So, what do you think? ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.)☆ 20:25, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

Support (3)

  1. Looks fine now.--PSIWolf 09:48, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
  2. I like the new templates. Frees up space on pages. Phinbart - just one of the huge Bart fans! 09:50, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
  3. Not as space consuming as the current ones, and once you know what the images mean you don't read it again anyway.--Cook879 17:08, 30 August 2011 (EDT)

Oppose (1)

#Some people may not directly think about hovering over the images and maybe even remove them because they think it's misplaced or something.--PSIWolf 08:53, 30 August 2011 (EDT)

  1. Oppose FatHomerTalk 12:23, 30 August 2011 (EDT)

Comments