• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: A new episode title, “Homer and Her Sisters”, has been announced!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: The Simpsons are trapped on a flight from Hell this December!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Talk:Kang and Kodos

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
Revision as of 17:38, October 9, 2015 by FatHomer (talk | contribs) (Let's discuss this)
This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the Kang and Kodos article.

Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~).
New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page.
New to Wikisimpsons? Welcome!
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. Only talk about edits to the article. If you want to ask questions about the content, ask on Wikisimpsons Answers.

Some talk page guidelines:

Be polite
Assume good faith
No personal attacks
Don't bite the newcomers!

Let's discuss this

Okay, we need to discuss Kang and Kodos.

  1. Kang has been mentioned to be male and Kodos' brother before. Several times he has been referred to as male.
  2. Kodos has been mentioned to be both male and female in the past.
  3. The only time they were mentioned to be a lesbian couple was in "Simpsorama". And I believe at least the part they appeared in was non-canon. However, Al Jean said the episode is canon. Plus, wiki policy states that later episodes trump older episodes.
  4. HOWEVER, Kang and Kodos DO NOT have eyelashes. Look at every female character, they have eyelashes. Now, look at every male character, they do not. This could be due to their species not being human? WRONG!

In conclusion, there is definitely mixed information about them. I feel we need to do something about it. All the information we don't know for sure should be reworded. Gender should be changed to unknown, they shouldn't be referred to by gender, their relationship shouldn't be mentioned (unknown relation under relatives). Just my thoughts, what does everyone else think? The Solar Dragon 18:22, October 9, 2015 (EDT)

I haven't really thought about this before but I completely agree with you. FatHomerTalk 18:38, October 9, 2015 (EDT)