Difference between revisions of "Blog:The end of projects"
Mythigator (talk | contribs) |
WebkinzMania (talk | contribs) (→Discussion) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
Maybe what's needed is a change in nomenclature. The Projects pages contain lots of good information about how to write articles that fall under the projects' various aegises, so they do serve as an effective style guide. Maybe we just need to call them style guide pages rather than projects, and make sure that each page has at least one active editor looking after it to make sure they stay current and adapt to any changes in how we operate. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 18:21, 18 February 2012 (EST) | Maybe what's needed is a change in nomenclature. The Projects pages contain lots of good information about how to write articles that fall under the projects' various aegises, so they do serve as an effective style guide. Maybe we just need to call them style guide pages rather than projects, and make sure that each page has at least one active editor looking after it to make sure they stay current and adapt to any changes in how we operate. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 18:21, 18 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I think they have a chance to be successful if more people would sign up and more people would participate in helping each project. Get rid of the most inactive and least efficient projects currently and if the other ones don't improve in activity and aren't efficient either, we should eventually remove them also. [[User:WebkinzMania|WebkinzMania]] 16:23, 19 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
<!-- DO NOT REMOVE THE FOLLOWING --> | <!-- DO NOT REMOVE THE FOLLOWING --> | ||
[[Category:Blogs]] | [[Category:Blogs]] | ||
Revision as of 17:23, February 19, 2012
During the meeting, it was briefly touched upon about the closing of projects. It is generally agreed that the projects are unused, and that the only one that ever really worked, until it suffered coordination problems, was Re-Watch. So, discuss below, whether we should keep projects or not.--Cook879 18:01, 18 February 2012 (EST)
Discussion
Maybe what's needed is a change in nomenclature. The Projects pages contain lots of good information about how to write articles that fall under the projects' various aegises, so they do serve as an effective style guide. Maybe we just need to call them style guide pages rather than projects, and make sure that each page has at least one active editor looking after it to make sure they stay current and adapt to any changes in how we operate. -- Mythigator 18:21, 18 February 2012 (EST)
- I think they have a chance to be successful if more people would sign up and more people would participate in helping each project. Get rid of the most inactive and least efficient projects currently and if the other ones don't improve in activity and aren't efficient either, we should eventually remove them also. WebkinzMania 16:23, 19 February 2012 (EST)
