Difference between revisions of "Talk:D'oh"
Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(→Move to Dictionary namespace) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:It should, but the page would have to change to fit in with the dictionary style.--[[User:Cook879|Cook879]] 13:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | :It should, but the page would have to change to fit in with the dictionary style.--[[User:Cook879|Cook879]] 13:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
No, as it's a catchphrase, although we could have the article as well as the Dictionary entry, perhaps? '''--'''<big>[[User:Will k|'''<span style="font-family:Windlass; font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px purple; color: blue">Will K</span>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Talk</span>''']] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Contribs</span>''']])</sup></big> 13:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | No, as it's a catchphrase, although we could have the article as well as the Dictionary entry, perhaps? '''--'''<big>[[User:Will k|'''<span style="font-family:Windlass; font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px purple; color: blue">Will K</span>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Talk</span>''']] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Contribs</span>''']])</sup></big> 13:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :This article couldn't really by converted into a dictionary page as well, due to all the sections that aren't incorporated in the definitions. A new definition page would work better.--[[User:Cook879|Cook879]] 13:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:56, July 17, 2011
| This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the D'oh article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Move to Dictionary namespace
Since this is a made-up word, should it be moved to the Dictionary namespace? ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.)☆ 12:17, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- It should, but the page would have to change to fit in with the dictionary style.--Cook879 13:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
No, as it's a catchphrase, although we could have the article as well as the Dictionary entry, perhaps? --Will K (Talk ~ Contribs) 13:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- This article couldn't really by converted into a dictionary page as well, due to all the sections that aren't incorporated in the definitions. A new definition page would work better.--Cook879 13:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
