Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Rollback requests"
Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(→TheSimpsons) |
(→Oppose (0)) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=== Oppose (0) === | === Oppose (0) === | ||
| + | *'''Oppose''' Quite frankly, I wouldn't trust this user with rollback. I've been checking his edits as of late, and he seems to favour making as many edits as possible. This includes adding what is essentially spam to articles (in one case, he added "this is odd" in an article [http://simpsons.wikia.com/index.php?title=Nancy_Cartwright&diff=prev&oldid=132631]) and making bad edits (such as turning working links into broken links [http://simpsons.wikia.com/index.php?title=Dan_Castellaneta&diff=next&oldid=132711]). Sure, he has made quite a few great contributions, but that doesn't hide the fact that edits like these create work for the rest of us because we have to clean up after him. -- [[User:Brian McClure|Brian McClure]] 11:49, August 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
=== Neutral (0) === | === Neutral (0) === | ||
Revision as of 06:49, August 10, 2010
- Users can nominate themselves.
- Nominees must be a fairly active contributor to WikiSimpsons, being active at least in the last six weeks
- As well, nominees ought to have more than 150 contributions, with at least 75% being in the mainspace.
- Nominees should demonstrate good understanding of WikiSimpsons policies, style, and conventions.
- Before a user is nominated, he or she must be asked if they will accept the nomination. If not, that user will not be nominated.
- A user must have reverted vandalism at least twice.
Be aware that sockpuppeting or getting friends to vote in the last minute will not be tolerated.
Contents
Nominees
TheSimpsons
I would make a great rollback,as you can trust me. Vote TheSimpsons! TheSimpsons Talk 10:47, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Support (0)
Oppose (0)
- Oppose Quite frankly, I wouldn't trust this user with rollback. I've been checking his edits as of late, and he seems to favour making as many edits as possible. This includes adding what is essentially spam to articles (in one case, he added "this is odd" in an article [1]) and making bad edits (such as turning working links into broken links [2]). Sure, he has made quite a few great contributions, but that doesn't hide the fact that edits like these create work for the rest of us because we have to clean up after him. -- Brian McClure 11:49, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral (0)
Comments
- Could you explain why you deserve the rights and what you will do with them? ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 10:49, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
