Difference between revisions of "Talk:Treehouse of Horror"
Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(→Canonocity) |
(→Canonocity) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. [[User:Gazlene the Pork Girl|Gazlene the Pork Girl]] 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT) | Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. [[User:Gazlene the Pork Girl|Gazlene the Pork Girl]] 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
:It's probably just easier to say that the whole episode is non-canon, that way there aren't any unnecessary, special canonicity rules created for a single episode. Also, nothing really happens during the Bart and Lisa parts that would be relevant enough to include in a canon article anyways, so it would be largely unneeded. That's my guess anyways. --[[User:Nick97|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97|<font color=turquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 18:21, 29 April 2013 (EDT) | :It's probably just easier to say that the whole episode is non-canon, that way there aren't any unnecessary, special canonicity rules created for a single episode. Also, nothing really happens during the Bart and Lisa parts that would be relevant enough to include in a canon article anyways, so it would be largely unneeded. That's my guess anyways. --[[User:Nick97|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97|<font color=turquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 18:21, 29 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
| + | :but is it really, it's better to make sure people know that the episode is canon. Also it's not the only treehouse of horror episode to have bart and lisa as a framing device, there are also the canon episodes tales from the public domain, Revenge Is a Dish Best Served Three Times, Now Museum, Now You Don't, Love, Springfieldian Style, Four Great Women and a Manicure and so on --[[User:ThehorseshoeCrab]] 8:40, 12 february, 2024 | ||
Latest revision as of 20:41, February 12, 2024
| This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the Treehouse of Horror article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
This article is part of Style Guide Episodes. |
|---|
Canonocity[edit]
Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. Gazlene the Pork Girl 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT)
- It's probably just easier to say that the whole episode is non-canon, that way there aren't any unnecessary, special canonicity rules created for a single episode. Also, nothing really happens during the Bart and Lisa parts that would be relevant enough to include in a canon article anyways, so it would be largely unneeded. That's my guess anyways. --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 18:21, 29 April 2013 (EDT)
- but is it really, it's better to make sure people know that the episode is canon. Also it's not the only treehouse of horror episode to have bart and lisa as a framing device, there are also the canon episodes tales from the public domain, Revenge Is a Dish Best Served Three Times, Now Museum, Now You Don't, Love, Springfieldian Style, Four Great Women and a Manicure and so on --User:ThehorseshoeCrab 8:40, 12 february, 2024
