Difference between revisions of "Talk:D'oh"
(→Move to Dictionary namespace) |
(→Move to Dictionary namespace) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
No, as it's a catchphrase, although we could have the article as well as the Dictionary entry, perhaps? '''--'''<big>[[User:Will k|'''<span style="font-family:Windlass; font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px purple; color: blue">Will K</span>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Talk</span>''']] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Contribs</span>''']])</sup></big> 13:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | No, as it's a catchphrase, although we could have the article as well as the Dictionary entry, perhaps? '''--'''<big>[[User:Will k|'''<span style="font-family:Windlass; font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px purple; color: blue">Will K</span>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Talk</span>''']] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Will k|'''<span style="font-weight:bold; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px orange; color: green">Contribs</span>''']])</sup></big> 13:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:This article couldn't really by converted into a dictionary page as well, due to all the sections that aren't incorporated in the definitions. A new definition page would work better.--[[User:Cook879|Cook879]] 13:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | :This article couldn't really by converted into a dictionary page as well, due to all the sections that aren't incorporated in the definitions. A new definition page would work better.--[[User:Cook879|Cook879]] 13:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | Splitting the page sounds better than moving all of the article to the Dictionary namespace because the dictionary only covers stuff about the actual word. [[User:Doh5678|Doh5678]] ([[User talk:Doh5678|talk]]) 14:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:09, July 17, 2011
| This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the D'oh article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Move to Dictionary namespace[edit]
Since this is a made-up word, should it be moved to the Dictionary namespace? ☆The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.)☆ 12:17, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- It should, but the page would have to change to fit in with the dictionary style.--Cook879 13:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
No, as it's a catchphrase, although we could have the article as well as the Dictionary entry, perhaps? --Will K (Talk ~ Contribs) 13:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- This article couldn't really by converted into a dictionary page as well, due to all the sections that aren't incorporated in the definitions. A new definition page would work better.--Cook879 13:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Splitting the page sounds better than moving all of the article to the Dictionary namespace because the dictionary only covers stuff about the actual word. Doh5678 (talk) 14:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
