Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charles Montgomery Burns"
(→siblings) |
(→Age: replaced: Simpson And Delilah → Simpson and Delilah) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Talkheader}} |
| + | {{Article Style Guide Characters}} | ||
| + | |||
==Name== | ==Name== | ||
I think we should combine this page with [[Charles Montgomery Burns]] depending on which name we want the article to go by. [[User:Thai420|Thai420]] 15:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC) | I think we should combine this page with [[Charles Montgomery Burns]] depending on which name we want the article to go by. [[User:Thai420|Thai420]] 15:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/68.83.135.195|68.83.135.195]] 02:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/68.83.135.195|68.83.135.195]] 02:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | But... according to Episode number 15 ([[Simpson | + | But... according to Episode number 15 ([[Simpson and Delilah]]) it reveals that C.M. Burns is only 81! {{Unsigned|FedericoF}} |
:Yes, but more recent episodes are usually more correct. [[User:Dohayecarumbadoh|Dohayecarumbadoh]] 17:34, May 23, 2010 (UTC) | :Yes, but more recent episodes are usually more correct. [[User:Dohayecarumbadoh|Dohayecarumbadoh]] 17:34, May 23, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:11, June 9, 2018
| This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the Charles Montgomery Burns article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
This article is part of Style Guide Characters. |
|---|
Name[edit]
I think we should combine this page with Charles Montgomery Burns depending on which name we want the article to go by. Thai420 15:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Age[edit]
According to episode 1304 (http://wtso.net/movie/52-The%20Simpsons%201304%20A%20Hunka%20Hunka%20Burns%20in%20Love.html - at about 8:20), Mr. Burns is 104 68.83.135.195 02:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
But... according to Episode number 15 (Simpson and Delilah) it reveals that C.M. Burns is only 81! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FedericoF (talk • contribs)
- Yes, but more recent episodes are usually more correct. Dohayecarumbadoh 17:34, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
siblings[edit]
dosnt Burns have alot more siblings than what is list i mean what about the ones in the photo from the episode double double boy in trouble?--Firelord jay 20:03, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Probably but they are unnamed. 92.7.195.72 20:09, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
