Difference between revisions of "Blog:The end of projects"
(Created page with "During the meeting, it was briefly touched upon about the closing of projects. It is generally agreed that the projects are unused, and that the only one that ever really work...") |
Mythigator (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
| − | + | Maybe what's needed is a change in nomenclature. The Projects pages contain lots of good information about how to write articles that fall under the projects' various aegises, so they do serve as an effective style guide. Maybe we just need to call them style guide pages rather than projects, and make sure that each page has at least one active editor looking after it to make sure they stay current and adapt to any changes in how we operate. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 18:21, 18 February 2012 (EST) | |
<!-- DO NOT REMOVE THE FOLLOWING --> | <!-- DO NOT REMOVE THE FOLLOWING --> | ||
[[Category:Blogs]] | [[Category:Blogs]] | ||
Revision as of 18:21, February 18, 2012
During the meeting, it was briefly touched upon about the closing of projects. It is generally agreed that the projects are unused, and that the only one that ever really worked, until it suffered coordination problems, was Re-Watch. So, discuss below, whether we should keep projects or not.--Cook879 18:01, 18 February 2012 (EST)
Discussion
Maybe what's needed is a change in nomenclature. The Projects pages contain lots of good information about how to write articles that fall under the projects' various aegises, so they do serve as an effective style guide. Maybe we just need to call them style guide pages rather than projects, and make sure that each page has at least one active editor looking after it to make sure they stay current and adapt to any changes in how we operate. -- Mythigator 18:21, 18 February 2012 (EST)
