Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dr. Ralph Wiggum"
(→thanks) |
(→thanks) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
those have already been deleted [[User:Basel17|Basel17]] 00:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | those have already been deleted [[User:Basel17|Basel17]] 00:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Episodes layout== | ||
| + | I already posted this on Basel's talk page, but seeing as you're the only other regular contributor here, I'll show you my idea as well. I think we need to decide on a set format for the episode pages. Alot of them have just been copied from Wikipedia, and so aren't written in the in-universe style that this Wiki is supposed to be written in. On Wikipedia we have to write pages from an out-of-universe perspective, so we must include a limited plot summary, production info, key cultural references, and reception all in prose, with no Trivia. However here, that is not the best idea. As such I propose to have a set style guideline for episodes. It's based on what the old Wikipedia episode page format was, and essentially what the ''Lost'' episode articles on Lostpedia are like. So: A detailed synopsis - as long as it needs to be. Then a good long Trivia section, perhaps with sub-sections: General notes about the episode, if it effects the overall show, if its events are mentioned again, key production information, key reception information such as awards, animation errors and continuity errors (not "Goofs", that word is horrible). Then a separate Cultural references section, detailing every reference made in the episode. And the same would apply to the movie, but that would obviously have more production points. Thoughts? [[User:Gran2|Gran2]] 13:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:07, January 12, 2008
Discuss stuff for Dr. Ralph Wiggum.
Welcome to my talk page.
Contents
Messages
The Simpsons Awards 2007
Look at the section on my user page. If you want to choose an episode for a category place your votes here.
Votes here
==My Votes== *Favourite Episode - 24 Minutes *Guest Star - Ronaldo *Funniest Episode - Homerazzi *One-Time Character - Milo *Song - Spider Pig *Special - Movie *Worst Episode - I Don't Wanna Know Why the Caged Bird Sings Kingcjc 12:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Reason
I did not know what you meant for a moment. Whatsover I have returned! That is until I have to go on vacation. But I will be back soon.
Note: I am not going today or anywhere soon. I might be going on a short vacation tough over the summer.Dr. Ralph Wiggum 21:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Richard
As you were the one who moved the page; where is it ever mention that Richard's surname is "Jennings"? Gran2 20:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Eh? It is was on Wikepedia, but I am guessing it was foolish editing.Dr. Ralph Wiggum 22:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, probably. It's gone (from Wikipedia) now anyway. Gran2 19:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thanks
thanks for the heads up on those dumb articles. If you find anymore tell right away so I can delete them. Basel17 05:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
those have already been deleted Basel17 00:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Episodes layout
I already posted this on Basel's talk page, but seeing as you're the only other regular contributor here, I'll show you my idea as well. I think we need to decide on a set format for the episode pages. Alot of them have just been copied from Wikipedia, and so aren't written in the in-universe style that this Wiki is supposed to be written in. On Wikipedia we have to write pages from an out-of-universe perspective, so we must include a limited plot summary, production info, key cultural references, and reception all in prose, with no Trivia. However here, that is not the best idea. As such I propose to have a set style guideline for episodes. It's based on what the old Wikipedia episode page format was, and essentially what the Lost episode articles on Lostpedia are like. So: A detailed synopsis - as long as it needs to be. Then a good long Trivia section, perhaps with sub-sections: General notes about the episode, if it effects the overall show, if its events are mentioned again, key production information, key reception information such as awards, animation errors and continuity errors (not "Goofs", that word is horrible). Then a separate Cultural references section, detailing every reference made in the episode. And the same would apply to the movie, but that would obviously have more production points. Thoughts? Gran2 13:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
