• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 36 News: More Preview Images and Details for “O C’mon All Ye Faithful” have been released!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dr. Ralph Wiggum"

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(thanks)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Welcome to my talk page.
 
Welcome to my talk page.
 
==Messages==
 
 
==The Simpsons Awards 2007==
 
Look at the section on my user page. If you want to choose an episode for a category place your votes here.
 
 
===Votes here===
 
==My Votes==
 
*Favourite Episode - 24 Minutes
 
*Guest Star - Ronaldo
 
*Funniest Episode - Homerazzi
 
*One-Time Character - Milo
 
*Song - Spider Pig
 
*Special - Movie
 
*Worst Episode - I Don't Wanna Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
 
    [[User:Kingcjc|Kingcjc]] 12:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
 
==Reason==
 
I did not know what you meant for a moment. Whatsover I have returned! That is until I have to go on vacation. But I will be back soon.
 
 
Note: I am not going today or anywhere soon. I might be going on a short vacation tough over the summer.[[User:Dr. Ralph Wiggum|Dr. Ralph Wiggum]] 21:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
==Richard==
 
As you were the one who moved the page; where is it ever mention that Richard's surname is "Jennings"? [[User:Gran2|Gran2]] 20:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
Eh? It is was on Wikepedia, but I am guessing it was foolish editing.[[User:Dr. Ralph Wiggum|Dr. Ralph Wiggum]] 22:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 
:Yeah, probably. It's gone (from Wikipedia) now anyway. [[User:Gran2|Gran2]] 19:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
== thanks ==
 
 
thanks for the heads up on those dumb articles. If you find anymore tell right away so I can delete them.  [[User:Basel17|Basel17]] 05:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
those have already been deleted  [[User:Basel17|Basel17]] 00:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 
  
 
==Episodes layout==
 
==Episodes layout==
 
I already posted this on Basel's talk page, but seeing as you're the only other regular contributor here, I'll show you my idea as well. I think we need to decide on a set format for the episode pages. Alot of them have just been copied from Wikipedia, and so aren't written in the in-universe style that this Wiki is supposed to be written in. On Wikipedia we have to write pages from an out-of-universe perspective, so we must include a limited plot summary, production info, key cultural references, and reception all in prose, with no Trivia. However here, that is not the best idea. As such I propose to have a set style guideline for episodes. It's based on what the old Wikipedia episode page format was, and essentially what the ''Lost'' episode articles on Lostpedia are like. So: A detailed synopsis - as long as it needs to be. Then a good long Trivia section, perhaps with sub-sections: General notes about the episode, if it effects the overall show, if its events are mentioned again, key production information, key reception information such as awards, animation errors and continuity errors (not "Goofs", that word is horrible). Then a separate Cultural references section, detailing every reference made in the episode. And the same would apply to the movie, but that would obviously have more production points. Thoughts? [[User:Gran2|Gran2]] 13:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 
I already posted this on Basel's talk page, but seeing as you're the only other regular contributor here, I'll show you my idea as well. I think we need to decide on a set format for the episode pages. Alot of them have just been copied from Wikipedia, and so aren't written in the in-universe style that this Wiki is supposed to be written in. On Wikipedia we have to write pages from an out-of-universe perspective, so we must include a limited plot summary, production info, key cultural references, and reception all in prose, with no Trivia. However here, that is not the best idea. As such I propose to have a set style guideline for episodes. It's based on what the old Wikipedia episode page format was, and essentially what the ''Lost'' episode articles on Lostpedia are like. So: A detailed synopsis - as long as it needs to be. Then a good long Trivia section, perhaps with sub-sections: General notes about the episode, if it effects the overall show, if its events are mentioned again, key production information, key reception information such as awards, animation errors and continuity errors (not "Goofs", that word is horrible). Then a separate Cultural references section, detailing every reference made in the episode. And the same would apply to the movie, but that would obviously have more production points. Thoughts? [[User:Gran2|Gran2]] 13:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:29, January 18, 2008

Discuss stuff for Dr. Ralph Wiggum.

Welcome to my talk page.

Episodes layout

I already posted this on Basel's talk page, but seeing as you're the only other regular contributor here, I'll show you my idea as well. I think we need to decide on a set format for the episode pages. Alot of them have just been copied from Wikipedia, and so aren't written in the in-universe style that this Wiki is supposed to be written in. On Wikipedia we have to write pages from an out-of-universe perspective, so we must include a limited plot summary, production info, key cultural references, and reception all in prose, with no Trivia. However here, that is not the best idea. As such I propose to have a set style guideline for episodes. It's based on what the old Wikipedia episode page format was, and essentially what the Lost episode articles on Lostpedia are like. So: A detailed synopsis - as long as it needs to be. Then a good long Trivia section, perhaps with sub-sections: General notes about the episode, if it effects the overall show, if its events are mentioned again, key production information, key reception information such as awards, animation errors and continuity errors (not "Goofs", that word is horrible). Then a separate Cultural references section, detailing every reference made in the episode. And the same would apply to the movie, but that would obviously have more production points. Thoughts? Gran2 13:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)