Difference between revisions of "Talk:White chocolate rabbit"
Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
Cook879bot (talk | contribs) m (replaced: <center>{{Article Project Games}}</center> → {{Article Project Games}}) |
Cook879bot (talk | contribs) m (renaming template, replaced: {{Article Project Games}} → {{Article Style Guide Games}}) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | {{Talkheader}} | ||
− | {{Article | + | {{Article Style Guide Characters}} |
− | {{Article | + | {{Article Style Guide Games}} |
==Uh...== | ==Uh...== | ||
Anyone else see a possible bug on the page? ----[[User:Smiley12|Smiley12]] <small vertical-align="center">([[User talk:Smiley12|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Smiley12|contribs]])</small> [[File:AWA Admin.png|45px|link=]] 05:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | Anyone else see a possible bug on the page? ----[[User:Smiley12|Smiley12]] <small vertical-align="center">([[User talk:Smiley12|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Smiley12|contribs]])</small> [[File:AWA Admin.png|45px|link=]] 05:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I am, the sidebar is a lot smaller. If you blank the edit box and show preview, the sidebar goes back to normal. It's probably a glitch with one of the templates used. --[[User:George|George]] 12:44, 26 December 2010 (UTC) | :I am, the sidebar is a lot smaller. If you blank the edit box and show preview, the sidebar goes back to normal. It's probably a glitch with one of the templates used. --[[User:George|George]] 12:44, 26 December 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:02, June 22, 2012
This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the White chocolate rabbit article. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
This article is part of Style Guide Characters. |
This article is part of Style Guide Games. |
Uh...[edit]
Anyone else see a possible bug on the page? ----Smiley12 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- I am, the sidebar is a lot smaller. If you blank the edit box and show preview, the sidebar goes back to normal. It's probably a glitch with one of the templates used. --George 12:44, 26 December 2010 (UTC)