Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dr. Ralph Wiggum"
(→admin) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Yes but how am I suposed to be an admin?[[User:Dr. Ralph Wiggum|Dr. Ralph Wiggum]] 22:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | Yes but how am I suposed to be an admin?[[User:Dr. Ralph Wiggum|Dr. Ralph Wiggum]] 22:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| − | :An admin or bureaucrat has to make you one.Sgtcook 16:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | + | :An admin or bureaucrat has to make you one.[[User:Sgtcook|Sgtcook]] 16:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | ::I seriously should be one because there are many articles here that should be deleted and many current admins have not been deleted here. Mainly, Penkinedymn and Never talks should be deleted as Penkinedymn is just a made up word and is nonsense while Never talks doesn't really need an article anyway there are more articles that should be deleted that I will get to later. Anyway, I have to find an admin or bureaucrat to talk to first.[[User:Dr. Ralph Wiggum|Dr. Ralph Wiggum]] 23:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:11, February 15, 2008
Discuss stuff for Dr. Ralph Wiggum.
Welcome to my talk page.
Episodes layout
I already posted this on Basel's talk page, but seeing as you're the only other regular contributor here, I'll show you my idea as well. I think we need to decide on a set format for the episode pages. Alot of them have just been copied from Wikipedia, and so aren't written in the in-universe style that this Wiki is supposed to be written in. On Wikipedia we have to write pages from an out-of-universe perspective, so we must include a limited plot summary, production info, key cultural references, and reception all in prose, with no Trivia. However here, that is not the best idea. As such I propose to have a set style guideline for episodes. It's based on what the old Wikipedia episode page format was, and essentially what the Lost episode articles on Lostpedia are like. So: A detailed synopsis - as long as it needs to be. Then a good long Trivia section, perhaps with sub-sections: General notes about the episode, if it effects the overall show, if its events are mentioned again, key production information, key reception information such as awards, animation errors and continuity errors (not "Goofs", that word is horrible). Then a separate Cultural references section, detailing every reference made in the episode. And the same would apply to the movie, but that would obviously have more production points. Thoughts? Gran2 13:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
good work
good work editing.i'd help but i'm busy working on my wiki.Sgtcook 17:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
admin
I personally think you should be an administer as you have done the most work on here and you could delete all the spam articles straight away and use the many other admin controls to make this wiki better.Sgtcook 20:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes but how am I suposed to be an admin?Dr. Ralph Wiggum 22:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- An admin or bureaucrat has to make you one.Sgtcook 16:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- I seriously should be one because there are many articles here that should be deleted and many current admins have not been deleted here. Mainly, Penkinedymn and Never talks should be deleted as Penkinedymn is just a made up word and is nonsense while Never talks doesn't really need an article anyway there are more articles that should be deleted that I will get to later. Anyway, I have to find an admin or bureaucrat to talk to first.Dr. Ralph Wiggum 23:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
