Difference between revisions of "Blog:"First mentioned" value for the Character infobox"
Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::I'm all for it. --[[User:Nick97|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97|<font color=turquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 01:22, 7 September 2012 (EDT) | :::I'm all for it. --[[User:Nick97|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97|<font color=turquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 01:22, 7 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
* I see no reason to oppose... [[File:Cjcsdonut.png|30px]] -- [[User talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 12:45, 18 September 2012 (EDT) | * I see no reason to oppose... [[File:Cjcsdonut.png|30px]] -- [[User talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 12:45, 18 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
− | :::This seems like a good idea. | + | :::This seems like a good idea. {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 17:59, 22 September 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 17:59, September 22, 2012
After editing an article the other day, Melissa Burlingame, I realised that perhaps we need a "First mentioned" value for Template:Character. Obviously, for people that appear, then are mentioned after, this would be useless, but for people that are mentioned first, before even appearing (or appearing at all), it seems a perfect idea. How does everyone else feel?
--Wk (talk) 05:43, 4 September 2012 (EDT)
- I have nothing against the idea.--Cook879 11:04, 6 September 2012 (EDT)
- I like it. /AleWi 11:08, 6 September 2012 (EDT)
- I see no reason to oppose... -- cjc 12:45, 18 September 2012 (EDT)
- This seems like a good idea. | | Talk | Contributions | Edit count | 17:59, 22 September 2012 (EDT)