Difference between revisions of "Wikisimpsons:Pages for deletion"
Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
Solar Dragon (talk | contribs) (→European female Moe) |
(→European female Moe) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:::Keep, we must not delete every article that is against the notability policy, some articles is funny and can give us more visitors. /[[User:AleWi|AleWi]] 16:15, 4 February 2013 (EST) | :::Keep, we must not delete every article that is against the notability policy, some articles is funny and can give us more visitors. /[[User:AleWi|AleWi]] 16:15, 4 February 2013 (EST) | ||
::::If we keep this article, it would mean we would have to modify the notability policy yet again to something like: "Unnamed non-speaking characters can have articles if the person who creates the article says so." or something stupid like that. It is against the policy. I have something about her in my Doppelgangers article in my userspace so it won't all go to waste. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 16:22, 4 February 2013 (EST) | ::::If we keep this article, it would mean we would have to modify the notability policy yet again to something like: "Unnamed non-speaking characters can have articles if the person who creates the article says so." or something stupid like that. It is against the policy. I have something about her in my Doppelgangers article in my userspace so it won't all go to waste. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 16:22, 4 February 2013 (EST) | ||
+ | ::::::I find the notability policy to hard, to many good article's being deleted, many is article-worthy like Cook says. /[[User:AleWi|AleWi]] 16:27, 4 February 2013 (EST) | ||
=== [[Schroeder-like boy]] === | === [[Schroeder-like boy]] === |
Revision as of 17:27, February 4, 2013
Pages for deletion (PfD) is where editors discuss whether a page should be deleted. Articles listed are normally discussed for at least five days after which the deletion process proceeds based on community consensus. Then the page may be kept, merged or redirected, moved to another title or deleted.
Creating an PfD discussion
If you want to create a deletion discussion simply list in the nominations section:
Example Page
Reason for Deletion ~~~~
Nominations
Cat Food
What the heck? Generic brand. Delete! --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 20:20, 25 January 2013 (EST)
- Technically it's not generic, since it's cat food made from cats. I'm neutral on this one. --Nick97 (talk ~ contribs) 19:25, 28 January 2013 (EST)
European female Moe
Unnamed, non-speaking character. Solar Dragon (Talk • Contribs.) 17:28, 28 January 2013 (EST)
- K. -- WebkinzManiaTalkContributionsEditcount 21:15, 28 January 2013 (EST)
- Delete. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 21:57, 2 February 2013 (EST)
- Keep, although it's a non-speaking character, it has a characteristic that distinguish it from others. --Notfut 16:28, 3 February 2013 (EST)Notfut
- It is against the notability policy though. (Talk - Contribs.) 15:05, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- Keep, although it's a non-speaking character, it has a characteristic that distinguish it from others. --Notfut 16:28, 3 February 2013 (EST)Notfut
- Delete. --Fred (Talk • Contribs. • Editcount) 21:57, 2 February 2013 (EST)
But I only came here to read about European female Moe!Delete. -- cjc 16:07, 4 February 2013 (EST)- I would say that, although non-speaking and non-named, she does seem an article-worthy character because it was the focus of that particular gag.--Cook879 16:13, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- Keep, we must not delete every article that is against the notability policy, some articles is funny and can give us more visitors. /AleWi 16:15, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- If we keep this article, it would mean we would have to modify the notability policy yet again to something like: "Unnamed non-speaking characters can have articles if the person who creates the article says so." or something stupid like that. It is against the policy. I have something about her in my Doppelgangers article in my userspace so it won't all go to waste. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 16:22, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- I find the notability policy to hard, to many good article's being deleted, many is article-worthy like Cook says. /AleWi 16:27, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- If we keep this article, it would mean we would have to modify the notability policy yet again to something like: "Unnamed non-speaking characters can have articles if the person who creates the article says so." or something stupid like that. It is against the policy. I have something about her in my Doppelgangers article in my userspace so it won't all go to waste. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 16:22, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- Keep, we must not delete every article that is against the notability policy, some articles is funny and can give us more visitors. /AleWi 16:15, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- I would say that, although non-speaking and non-named, she does seem an article-worthy character because it was the focus of that particular gag.--Cook879 16:13, 4 February 2013 (EST)
Schroeder-like boy
Unnamed, non-speaking character. The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.) 14:35, 4 February 2013 (EST)
- Keep, although it's a non-speaking character, it has a characteristic that distinguish it from others! --Notfut 14:50, 4 February 2013 (EST)Notfut
- But it's against our notability policy. Therefore policy dictates that it should be deleted. The Solar Dragon (Talk - Contribs.) 15:05, 4 February 2013 (EST)