Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sarah Wiggum"
Solar Dragon (talk | contribs) (→Continuity of the characterization and personality Retcon) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I'd say we should make a part on this page that explains the retcon and inconsistent characteristics from what has been established in the past, and Matt Selman once said this as well as a general statement, "We're not saying this is the official continuity now, and none of that other stuff happened. We're just saying that this is a silly way to present the character’s life. It doesn't mean that the people's beloved episodes from the past didn't happen. They all kind of happened in their imaginary world, you know, and people can choose to love whichever version they love." Now I'm iffy on a lot of stuff Matt Selman says as he is known to not make a whole lot of sense on certain things along with no logic, such as his Canon Non Canon argument, or even this retcon, but anyways, we should look into this, and me personally I refuse to believe this retcon is Sarah as this is just not her type of character compared to what she has always been, and its down right disrespectful to even Pamala Hayden by getting a celebrity VA to destroy a character by breathing a dark poisonous mean spirited attitude and life into one of her characters which has been established more emotionally and by actions rather then dialog such as also for example with Gloria Prince. I would think eventually her original self and voice will return eventually as if non of this retcon stuff happened. [[User:Duderocks5539|Duderocks5539]] ([[User talk:Duderocks5539|talk]]) 20:27, June 5, 2022 (EDT) | I'd say we should make a part on this page that explains the retcon and inconsistent characteristics from what has been established in the past, and Matt Selman once said this as well as a general statement, "We're not saying this is the official continuity now, and none of that other stuff happened. We're just saying that this is a silly way to present the character’s life. It doesn't mean that the people's beloved episodes from the past didn't happen. They all kind of happened in their imaginary world, you know, and people can choose to love whichever version they love." Now I'm iffy on a lot of stuff Matt Selman says as he is known to not make a whole lot of sense on certain things along with no logic, such as his Canon Non Canon argument, or even this retcon, but anyways, we should look into this, and me personally I refuse to believe this retcon is Sarah as this is just not her type of character compared to what she has always been, and its down right disrespectful to even Pamala Hayden by getting a celebrity VA to destroy a character by breathing a dark poisonous mean spirited attitude and life into one of her characters which has been established more emotionally and by actions rather then dialog such as also for example with Gloria Prince. I would think eventually her original self and voice will return eventually as if non of this retcon stuff happened. [[User:Duderocks5539|Duderocks5539]] ([[User talk:Duderocks5539|talk]]) 20:27, June 5, 2022 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Dude, calm down. There's no need to add a section about this. Characters have different voice actors sometimes. What is your problem? <span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span> 06:59, June 6, 2022 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:59, June 6, 2022
| This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the Sarah Wiggum article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
This article is part of Style Guide Characters. |
|---|
Non Canon
Since Uncut Femmes has been established as non canon, and the fact Sarah is back to normal as of the first episode of Season 33, can my edit of this page from September 4th be reverted back? Duderocks5539 (talk) 23:26, December 9, 2021 (EST)
- I will work on it. The Solar Dragon 06:58, December 10, 2021 (EST)
- Just added additional appearances and a few other things. Looks like some troll hijacked the page the other day and put stuff like "Milf" and other stuff lmao. You guys got on it right away though. Prop's to your guy's management of this wiki. Duderocks5539 (talk) 19:56, December 10, 2021 (EST)
Continuity of the characterization and personality Retcon
In the Season 33 finale, Sarah is in the retconned fashion again personality wise at the beginning of the episode, which is like a rebel say like Shauna, that likes to drink I guess, but her original design is back, but Megan Mullaly is doing the voice again. Now the episode was considered non canon as well, but maybe the page can be tweaked somewhat since we don't know if this retcon will keep going, or if she will eventually revert back to being a Wiggum with the Wiggumy traits and personalities. They did do a similar change with Barney years back with making him sober for a while before reverting him back, and I suppose this will be the same eventually as well since it costs money to bring Celebrity Megan Mullaly in even to do short speaking roles when she has more important roles to do in other shows of which I'm sure she would rather do that and get paid more, as well as the fact that Sarah is a side character and not a really important character as the main focuses of course are our 5 main players and other more important side characters, and the effort would be more put into that stuff. At this point Sarah has 2 separate personalities despite only being shown in this fashion 2 times with the first time being a body design change as well which was sexist tbh, but even in the non speaking appearances when she returned as a cameo starting in the episode beginning of this past season along with design, she is in her sweets and sugars friendly and happy mood which she always has been of which that's consistent even in this finale episode when she's not talking, its just when she speaks she's this different character. But the personality and traits she has had since her debut is really truly the canon personality of her since its the most consistent compared to this retcon.
I'd say we should make a part on this page that explains the retcon and inconsistent characteristics from what has been established in the past, and Matt Selman once said this as well as a general statement, "We're not saying this is the official continuity now, and none of that other stuff happened. We're just saying that this is a silly way to present the character’s life. It doesn't mean that the people's beloved episodes from the past didn't happen. They all kind of happened in their imaginary world, you know, and people can choose to love whichever version they love." Now I'm iffy on a lot of stuff Matt Selman says as he is known to not make a whole lot of sense on certain things along with no logic, such as his Canon Non Canon argument, or even this retcon, but anyways, we should look into this, and me personally I refuse to believe this retcon is Sarah as this is just not her type of character compared to what she has always been, and its down right disrespectful to even Pamala Hayden by getting a celebrity VA to destroy a character by breathing a dark poisonous mean spirited attitude and life into one of her characters which has been established more emotionally and by actions rather then dialog such as also for example with Gloria Prince. I would think eventually her original self and voice will return eventually as if non of this retcon stuff happened. Duderocks5539 (talk) 20:27, June 5, 2022 (EDT)
