• New article from the Springfield Shopper: Season 35 News: New promotional images for “The Tell-Tale Pants” have been released!
  • New article from the Springfield Shopper: Homer is obsessed with gratuitous gratuities this May!
  • Wikisimpsons needs more Featured Article, Picture, Quote, Episode and Comprehensive article nominations!
  • Wikisimpsons has a Discord server! Click here for your invite! Join to talk about the wiki, Simpsons and Tapped Out news, or just to talk to other users.
  • Make an account! It's easy, free, and your work on the wiki can be attributed to you.
TwitterFacebookDiscord

User talk:Kit Krap

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki

Welcome![edit]

Wiki.png

Hello, Kit Krap, and welcome to Wikisimpsons!

Thank you for your edits to User:Kit Krap and taking interest in our wiki. If you have any troubles, feel free to ask questions on my talk page or any other any experienced editors' talk page. Also, you could look at a help page.

Here are a few pages to help out new editors such as yourself:

Please note, any spam comments and editing to get badges will result in an instant block.

Please sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your name and the date. Signing your comments is important, as it lets other editors know who has posted which comments.

Again, welcome!
---- Solar Dragon (Talk) 21:38, 30 August 2010

Treehouse of Horror XII[edit]

I saw your comment that the article for Treehouse of Horror XII had way too many quotes. You were right, and here's why it was that way: When I first started working on the article, it had been completely copied and pasted from Wikipedia, which is a no-no around here. (It's happened before, and cleaning up after "wikidumps" could easily be a full-time project.) So I gave the article a complete rewrite, with the aim of making it resemble the Wikipedia article as little as possible, and it admittedly ended up on the wordy side. The number of quotes definitely did not help the cause! The trimmings you did were all good ones, and the article is in better shape now, but I did put a quote or two back, in spots where the article flows better with a quote than without. So anyway, thank you for taking an interest in the article. I figure after the work you've put into it, you more than deserve an explanation for the state it was in when you first encountered it. -- Mythigator 20:23, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

  • Ah, it alright. There's no need for an explanation. The article was great to start with anyway. And I know how tiring wikidumps are when it comes to cleaning them up. What I try to do is to rephrase most of the sentences, add a few details here, remove a few details here. It takes a while but if know the episode really well and are good with synonyms, next thing you know it turns out to be a fresh, new article. Kit Krap 20:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)